Being able to invent a vaccine is different to 'being qualified' to inform government policy on coercing hundreds of millions of people to take (or not take) that vaccine. They are 2 different domains.
Inventor of Gizmo X, vs 'so inventor, who should use your shiny new gizmo?' - yeah these are very different conversations. One technical and scientific, one atechnical but with a sales or marketing slant.
Coercive force and threats pertaining to people using their gizmo on the other hand is an area that any sane and decent inventor would shun.
How many people have heard behind closed doors 'well the YYYY industry would be very upset if we promoted your alternative and they have deep pockets and few scruples'?
Being able to invent a vaccine is different to 'being qualified' to inform government policy on coercing hundreds of millions of people to take (or not take) that vaccine. They are 2 different domains.
Inventor of Gizmo X, vs 'so inventor, who should use your shiny new gizmo?' - yeah these are very different conversations. One technical and scientific, one atechnical but with a sales or marketing slant.
Coercive force and threats pertaining to people using their gizmo on the other hand is an area that any sane and decent inventor would shun.
How many people have heard behind closed doors 'well the YYYY industry would be very upset if we promoted your alternative and they have deep pockets and few scruples'?