This site is for us to share our research with others. "Always verify" makes sense as a precaution, but "Do your own research" just sounds lazy and really isn't helpful.
Not everyone can "monitor the situation" to the degree of rigor that thorough research requires. Many are still waging a daily war of just trying to survive among crippling debt and overwhelming inflation. Some use GAW simply to help filter out the excess noise on X (since most posts here are just reposts of stuff from X anyway).
Please be mindful that many are not as blessed with their free time as you might be.
Ok, but that does not negate what I showed you - Grok can be useful and does not have inherent bias against Q.
It has a bias toward mainstream / accepted ideas, but if you steer it in other directions it does not resist.
"If you steer it". Exactly. If you tell it what you want to hear, it will tell you what you want to hear.
Not sure if you actually read through those posts I sent, but some seem to be pretty biased against Q. Want me to start pulling quotes?
Did you read the Grok convo I linked? Can you find anything in there biased against Q?
Did you read the ones I linked that said this was an antisemetic conspiracy theory echo chamber?
Because you had it examine one convo that didn't say anything biased against us negates the dozen or so I'm sitting on right now that is heavily critical of us?
Re-read this thread. You're missing the key point: Grok is not inherently anti-Q or pro-Q.