Why? What is the purpose of giving us comms? What exactly are we supposed to do with them? Other than spend hours, days, months, and years trying to figure out what they mean?
For something to truly be "comms", all parties involved need to have a standardized set of information to draw from, that's agreed on before hand.
That's not what we have here. Quite frankly, it's just guessing. And we have an absolutely horrible success rate of determining what these "comms" are. Basically it's just guessing and projecting what we want to happen into the comms.
I know that it's going to really make people angry at me for saying this, but it just seems like a very elaborate game. People spend hours and days and even years hunting through old posts and drops, trying to finagle numbers that match up to what they want things to mean, making elaborate collages with the ever popular red lines linking various bits and pieces, etc.
And for what? What are we supposed to do with this information? That we get wrong the vast majority of the time?
I would start listing off all the failed "comms" interpretations that I've seen since I came here shortly after J6, but I'm sure that would get me sent to time out for "dooming". Just go back and start reading old chats and you can see for yourself. You can sort them by "top" and "all time" and it will take you way back and you can just start going from there.
Maybe the White Hats are monitoring our comments to see how well we see through the crap, which I believe you do very well.
If we 'pass' then we are ready for the next step. When I say we, I'm not just talking about anons, I mean everybody.
Doesn't it seem like we are repeating some things? For instance, we dealt with Biden for four years so we could see how bad things can get. Well, we must not have learned enough because it seems we are repeating it with Mamdani. (We means everyone.)
Election integrity, we just keep going round and round, but still not enough people standing up.
I think this is taking longer than even the White Hats predicted because we were more asleep that they anticipated.
For this particular 'communication', they are hoping enough people say what you just said or at least something like, "This is just a movie, everything is bs.", so we can move forward.
That doesn’t line up with what we've repeatedly been told, though.
If we’re "watching a movie", then everything is already scripted and our role is passive.
But if things only happen when people are "ready", then it’s not a movie, it’s dependent on random public behavior.
Same problem with "trust the plan". Either it’s controlled and already set, or it depends on millions of people acting a certain way. It can’t be both. Because you can't have a set plan based on what millions/billions of people might possibly do in the future.
And again, it completely overlooks the fact that "comms" have to be a standardized set of data that all parties know and agree upon, ahead of time. Otherwise, it's just guessing. And based on reading this board for the past 5 years, we don't have the best track record of guessing correctly.
I want to be clear that I 100% believe there is a plan. I simply don't agree with what so many other Anons believe, like all of these "comms" being everywhere. And it's not like Anons can't be wrong about things.
Unfortunately it seems like what the loudest/most agressive/most active Anons say is supposed to set the narrative for what we're all supposed to believe. And if anyone disagrees, then they're called a doomer or shill or retard.
And when those Anons are proven wrong, well, they just pivot, come up with a brand-spanking-new theory to work with and conveniently forgets how very wrong they were the last go around.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but you're not providing an alternative either.
using your logic why would Trump have any reason to say any of the things he says? it's not comms so it's _________?
this is where I also struggle because sometimes I think just like you express and then I try to come up with the opposing argument and every time the opposing argument just falls flat.
for me to fill in that blank the only thing that makes sense would be that Trump is just trying to Garner attention and puff up his ego reading Twitter comments. And that would suck if he was actually that shallow.
Why? What is the purpose of giving us comms? What exactly are we supposed to do with them? Other than spend hours, days, months, and years trying to figure out what they mean?
For something to truly be "comms", all parties involved need to have a standardized set of information to draw from, that's agreed on before hand.
That's not what we have here. Quite frankly, it's just guessing. And we have an absolutely horrible success rate of determining what these "comms" are. Basically it's just guessing and projecting what we want to happen into the comms.
I know that it's going to really make people angry at me for saying this, but it just seems like a very elaborate game. People spend hours and days and even years hunting through old posts and drops, trying to finagle numbers that match up to what they want things to mean, making elaborate collages with the ever popular red lines linking various bits and pieces, etc.
And for what? What are we supposed to do with this information? That we get wrong the vast majority of the time?
I would start listing off all the failed "comms" interpretations that I've seen since I came here shortly after J6, but I'm sure that would get me sent to time out for "dooming". Just go back and start reading old chats and you can see for yourself. You can sort them by "top" and "all time" and it will take you way back and you can just start going from there.
.
Maybe the White Hats are monitoring our comments to see how well we see through the crap, which I believe you do very well.
If we 'pass' then we are ready for the next step. When I say we, I'm not just talking about anons, I mean everybody.
Doesn't it seem like we are repeating some things? For instance, we dealt with Biden for four years so we could see how bad things can get. Well, we must not have learned enough because it seems we are repeating it with Mamdani. (We means everyone.)
Election integrity, we just keep going round and round, but still not enough people standing up.
I think this is taking longer than even the White Hats predicted because we were more asleep that they anticipated.
For this particular 'communication', they are hoping enough people say what you just said or at least something like, "This is just a movie, everything is bs.", so we can move forward.
That doesn’t line up with what we've repeatedly been told, though.
If we’re "watching a movie", then everything is already scripted and our role is passive. But if things only happen when people are "ready", then it’s not a movie, it’s dependent on random public behavior.
Same problem with "trust the plan". Either it’s controlled and already set, or it depends on millions of people acting a certain way. It can’t be both. Because you can't have a set plan based on what millions/billions of people might possibly do in the future.
And again, it completely overlooks the fact that "comms" have to be a standardized set of data that all parties know and agree upon, ahead of time. Otherwise, it's just guessing. And based on reading this board for the past 5 years, we don't have the best track record of guessing correctly.
I want to be clear that I 100% believe there is a plan. I simply don't agree with what so many other Anons believe, like all of these "comms" being everywhere. And it's not like Anons can't be wrong about things.
Unfortunately it seems like what the loudest/most agressive/most active Anons say is supposed to set the narrative for what we're all supposed to believe. And if anyone disagrees, then they're called a doomer or shill or retard.
And when those Anons are proven wrong, well, they just pivot, come up with a brand-spanking-new theory to work with and conveniently forgets how very wrong they were the last go around.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but you're not providing an alternative either.
using your logic why would Trump have any reason to say any of the things he says? it's not comms so it's _________?
this is where I also struggle because sometimes I think just like you express and then I try to come up with the opposing argument and every time the opposing argument just falls flat.
for me to fill in that blank the only thing that makes sense would be that Trump is just trying to Garner attention and puff up his ego reading Twitter comments. And that would suck if he was actually that shallow.
🤷♀️