Wait.... So you literally believe that when Trump is doing a press conference, or when you see a propaganda report on TV (or the web) that it is actually, a literal movie? As in, a super-long, multi-year length piece of film strip that is simply being projected on any screen or information source you access? I mean, literally?
That logic would destroy anything Q said
That's kinda dumb. No it would not.
relating to Movie or Actors and brand it all analogy
Er, yeah, its an anology. Unless you think every single person you ever thought connected to the work of the [Plan] is being paid a salary to be an actor in a film...
So, is Trump a paid actor?
The analogy that Q employs works. Q is stating, BY ANALOGY, that a lot of what we see is in fact 'acted out' (aka its performative), some of it scripted, some of it dependent on "Moves and countermoves".
I mean, your assertion that its NOT an analogy means it's all literally a film, when Q themselves said referred to the frame as an analogy.
You seem to think that 'analogy' means it's not: effective? insightful? Informational?
The "anything Q said" line is kinda weird, too. That sort of blanket reasoning seems really unproductive/ineffective to me.
Take the current Iran operation, for example. Literally a movie? Or a movie by analogy? Potentially, the information we're given is pure narrative, the film clips produced to look like X, when they are in fact Y, the story lines essentially scripted, etc, but this doesn't mean its literally "a movie". It means the analogy of a movie is a highly informative description highlighting certain aspects and features of what we are 'seeing'.
Wait.... So you literally believe that when Trump is doing a press conference, or when you see a propaganda report on TV (or the web) that it is actually, a literal movie? As in, a super-long, multi-year length piece of film strip that is simply being projected on any screen or information source you access? I mean, literally?
That's kinda dumb. No it would not.
Er, yeah, its an anology. Unless you think every single person you ever thought connected to the work of the [Plan] is being paid a salary to be an actor in a film...
So, is Trump a paid actor?
The analogy that Q employs works. Q is stating, BY ANALOGY, that a lot of what we see is in fact 'acted out' (aka its performative), some of it scripted, some of it dependent on "Moves and countermoves".
I mean, your assertion that its NOT an analogy means it's all literally a film, when Q themselves said referred to the frame as an analogy.
You seem to think that 'analogy' means it's not: effective? insightful? Informational?
The "anything Q said" line is kinda weird, too. That sort of blanket reasoning seems really unproductive/ineffective to me.
Take the current Iran operation, for example. Literally a movie? Or a movie by analogy? Potentially, the information we're given is pure narrative, the film clips produced to look like X, when they are in fact Y, the story lines essentially scripted, etc, but this doesn't mean its literally "a movie". It means the analogy of a movie is a highly informative description highlighting certain aspects and features of what we are 'seeing'.