Rogan used to LOVE talking about conspiracies and went DEEP in the rabbit holes.
But around 2018 or 2019 men in suits musta visited Rogan, as after that year he then shut down any and all conspiracies that are not approved/ safe.
He has to continually shut down Eddie bravo on his conspiracy talk, when earlier he would have joined Eddie.
Very sad to see Rogan change course and be a deep state stooge now. I have mostly stopped listening to JRE, and I used to listen to them back at episode 9 when it was only on YouTube!
I have Whitney Webb's book One Nation Under Blackmail, and watch some of her video discussions. And, I've been a paid subscriber to Catherine Austin Fitts. I have a number of her polished semi-annual reports in old-fashioned bound paper format.
I get what you mean. They are good in many respects, but in the end see Trump as bad news. As just a difference version of the UN/WEF/Davos crowd. This being despite the Establishment's obvious intense hatred of Trumps speeches at their venues, and despite 10 years of constant anti-Trump media barrage. Patrick Wood of Technocracy News, who is deeply Christian by the way, is another example.
Around this Board I think it is easy to forget how radicalizing the Q drops really are. I mean that in a good way. Radicalizing in terms of the clarity it brings to interpreting unfolding world events.
Try to imagine how you would react to what is going on without having first passed through the test of Q. For many, Trump's actions would seem chaotic, verging on incomprehensible.
So, taking Catherine Austin Fitts for example, when I integrate her non-support of Trump against her total body of work, being compromised from SES influence is not the conclusion I draw. I see a person who is operating without a critical piece of the puzzle. She believes the solution to the totalitarian control wishes of "Mr. Global" - as she terms it - is grassroots resistance. Homesteading. Local resilience networks, that sort of thing. This is a characteristic tell. The ongoing battle between two titanic forces is outside her field of vision, and those like her.
The same cannot be said of Tucker and Candice and similar loud voices.
If we step up to the 100,000 foot view, what is the Q Plan? Consider: the enemy had infiltrated and nearly conquered all the heights of social institutions. Government, military, industry, banking, academia, media, sports, art. Everything. Against those odds, what is your military strategy?
The Q solution was to lay low for a long while. Observing. Tracking. Tracing. Building a below-the-radar patriot network. Letting the enemy continue to construct their surveillance control grid. Then, at the opportune moment, grabbing control of the grid and turning it against them.
There is no historical precedence for what we are witnessing. No touchstone where people can go ah, this is like that. Andrew Jackson's struggle with the Rothchild bankers was a skirmish relative to today's match to the death.
He used to go DEEP with Eddie Bravo on all sorts of topics, nothing was off limits. But after that 2018ish visit, he now COMPLETELY shuts down any and all conspiracy talk about certain topics... It AKWARD now when Eddie tries to talk about some things, and Joe has to change the topic and stop Eddie from going on his once normal rants. Joe 100% changed, anyone who has watched JRE since 2008 knows what I am talking about, and it doesnt have to do with austin. it was when he lived in CA.
I'm out of the loop on Joe Rogan. But from video snippets I had formed the impression that with his relaxed style he is good at opening up topics to a widespread, more average audience. What was this 2018ish visit you mention? It sounds like a turning point, a result of behind-the-scenes leverage.
BooniesRedneck makes a good point. How does it reconcile?
Rogan used to LOVE talking about conspiracies and went DEEP in the rabbit holes.
But around 2018 or 2019 men in suits musta visited Rogan, as after that year he then shut down any and all conspiracies that are not approved/ safe.
He has to continually shut down Eddie bravo on his conspiracy talk, when earlier he would have joined Eddie.
Very sad to see Rogan change course and be a deep state stooge now. I have mostly stopped listening to JRE, and I used to listen to them back at episode 9 when it was only on YouTube!
I have Whitney Webb's book One Nation Under Blackmail, and watch some of her video discussions. And, I've been a paid subscriber to Catherine Austin Fitts. I have a number of her polished semi-annual reports in old-fashioned bound paper format.
I get what you mean. They are good in many respects, but in the end see Trump as bad news. As just a difference version of the UN/WEF/Davos crowd. This being despite the Establishment's obvious intense hatred of Trumps speeches at their venues, and despite 10 years of constant anti-Trump media barrage. Patrick Wood of Technocracy News, who is deeply Christian by the way, is another example.
Around this Board I think it is easy to forget how radicalizing the Q drops really are. I mean that in a good way. Radicalizing in terms of the clarity it brings to interpreting unfolding world events.
Try to imagine how you would react to what is going on without having first passed through the test of Q. For many, Trump's actions would seem chaotic, verging on incomprehensible.
So, taking Catherine Austin Fitts for example, when I integrate her non-support of Trump against her total body of work, being compromised from SES influence is not the conclusion I draw. I see a person who is operating without a critical piece of the puzzle. She believes the solution to the totalitarian control wishes of "Mr. Global" - as she terms it - is grassroots resistance. Homesteading. Local resilience networks, that sort of thing. This is a characteristic tell. The ongoing battle between two titanic forces is outside her field of vision, and those like her.
The same cannot be said of Tucker and Candice and similar loud voices.
If we step up to the 100,000 foot view, what is the Q Plan? Consider: the enemy had infiltrated and nearly conquered all the heights of social institutions. Government, military, industry, banking, academia, media, sports, art. Everything. Against those odds, what is your military strategy?
The Q solution was to lay low for a long while. Observing. Tracking. Tracing. Building a below-the-radar patriot network. Letting the enemy continue to construct their surveillance control grid. Then, at the opportune moment, grabbing control of the grid and turning it against them.
There is no historical precedence for what we are witnessing. No touchstone where people can go ah, this is like that. Andrew Jackson's struggle with the Rothchild bankers was a skirmish relative to today's match to the death.
He left California and moved to Austin, he hasn’t changed.
No, he literally changed.
He used to go DEEP with Eddie Bravo on all sorts of topics, nothing was off limits. But after that 2018ish visit, he now COMPLETELY shuts down any and all conspiracy talk about certain topics... It AKWARD now when Eddie tries to talk about some things, and Joe has to change the topic and stop Eddie from going on his once normal rants. Joe 100% changed, anyone who has watched JRE since 2008 knows what I am talking about, and it doesnt have to do with austin. it was when he lived in CA.
I wonder why. He did call out the Covid BS and ivermectin.
I'm out of the loop on Joe Rogan. But from video snippets I had formed the impression that with his relaxed style he is good at opening up topics to a widespread, more average audience. What was this 2018ish visit you mention? It sounds like a turning point, a result of behind-the-scenes leverage.
BooniesRedneck makes a good point. How does it reconcile?
Yes, around that time he completely changed and no longer went into conspiracy theories freely, and SHUT THEM DOWN asap whenever Eddie went into them.
Is a DRASTIC change for anyone who listened to more than only "clips"