Just something I've been wondering about and pondering over lately, figured I'd start a thread for everyone to discuss it. What did Q mean when he said it was gonna be Biblical and about protecting our DNA?
Like the obvious direct way of thinking about it, just means "large in scale" and "literally protect your DNA from things like the jab".
But as we know Q RARELY means what he says at face value. So that has me wondering what OTHER interpretations one could have of this. I've seen all kinds of answers from OTHER, places that're like Q adjacent but not straight up Q. Like for example, going back to a "pre flood" type of world, where people live MUCH longer because our DNA is going to be reverted back to pre flood human DNA before it was corrupted, (I've even seen some claim literal immortality, but you know who knows at this point?). And there's been A LOT of progress on things like that as of late with all these weird companies trying to extend the human lifespan or "cure aging". Famously, putin and xi were openly talking about literal immortality together during one of their meetings, so its not like its a fringe thing if you have world leaders, who we believe are either on our side or at the very least NOT part of the cabal talking about it openly.
Then there's other stuff I've seen like, the "its Biblical" part leading up to the literal return of Christ without our lifetime (IE by defeating all of this evil, it sets things up for the Jesus to finally return) or just something happening or being revealed that proves the existence of an afterlife without a shadow of a doubt and Heaven, hell, God, Jesus, all of that. Thus leading to a world wide shift in life itself given how that would upend entire belief systems, world views, etc. etc.
There's plenty more, but that's just a few examples of what I've seen. Figured I'd start a thread to see what people thing this type of stuff was supposed to mean by Q.
I don't disagree, but at the same time it's a verifiable fact that certain things WERE left out of the Bible when the first Church was established. Even if you DON'T think that the Bible has been manipulated throughout history to some extent or another (which a lot of people do, see the scholfield Bible controversy for example), a large number of Biblical texts were left out of the Bible by the council of Nicea simply for practical reasons. They needed a book that could easily be travel size to send out into the world with evangelists. Its hardly practical to carry an entire library with you back in the early AD days to preach EVERY single Biblical text. That's how things like the dead sea scrolls, the book of giants, etc. etc. came about that most people consider to be accurate and ALSO true.