This is the AI translation and dubbing that of the full Netherlands hearing. It may contain a couple errors.
This was an appellate hearing on whether witness testimony would be allowed in the ongoing trial, as well as independent media and the public in the court room during the trial. The court will give a decision in a few weeks.
The five potential witnesses in the case are Dr. Michael Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Katherine Watt, Sasha Latypova, and Dr. Joseph Sansone. Sasha Latypova, and Dr. Joseph Sansone attended the hearing.
Attorney Peter Stassen gave a historic presentation to the court. Please share this far and wide. People need to see this presentation.
Given that these types of cases are inevitable, I really wonder is the motive that big pharma agreed that one single company would claim “ownership” of the poison tech, so they alone could be sued.
Then this company goes wallop, and the others keep poisoning at their leisure.
They could sue the crap out of each other and push the money around (between themselves) then let a big domino ( hollow shell -after redistribution ) go bust before big stuff hits from ‘the public’.
Netherlands Hearing in Bioweapons Genocide Case Against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla
https://old.bitchute.com/video/zFZ6M4OW65gN/
This is the AI translation and dubbing that of the full Netherlands hearing. It may contain a couple errors.
This was an appellate hearing on whether witness testimony would be allowed in the ongoing trial, as well as independent media and the public in the court room during the trial. The court will give a decision in a few weeks.
The five potential witnesses in the case are Dr. Michael Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Katherine Watt, Sasha Latypova, and Dr. Joseph Sansone. Sasha Latypova, and Dr. Joseph Sansone attended the hearing.
Attorney Peter Stassen gave a historic presentation to the court. Please share this far and wide. People need to see this presentation.
Given that these types of cases are inevitable, I really wonder is the motive that big pharma agreed that one single company would claim “ownership” of the poison tech, so they alone could be sued.
Then this company goes wallop, and the others keep poisoning at their leisure.
Possibly so….
They could sue the crap out of each other and push the money around (between themselves) then let a big domino ( hollow shell -after redistribution ) go bust before big stuff hits from ‘the public’.