I can’t debate you on the he-said/she-said stuff,

Its not he said/she said. Its "she said / I disproved with sauce" - no brainer for a real truth seeker really.

if you don’t listen to the journalists who report these things

So you are saying I should trust these people even when the things they say are provably false

No one said Trump killed Charlie directly..

Of course that would be a stupid assertion to make since Trump was not in the crowd that day pulling the trigger. But even with that caveat it is so easy to prove you wrong with Sauce

See, this is the whole point of Candace. She thinks she is smart and tries not to "say" things but put thoughts in people's mind without evidence like a mind virus, that contaminates everything they think about after that. But she is not that smart and she lets loose her real intentions eventually, always.

Oh, and this is exactly the same way people on the left get brainwashed by their favourite "investigative journalists", except our side are supposedly smarter.

But let’s focus on the bullet. How could you possibly think a 30-06 did that damage to Charlie’s neck?

Yes lets focus on the bullet. Personally firing a weapon does not make you an expert. You gotta look at the evidence. The recently unsealed documents show that even the defense does not argue that a 30-06 was used for the assassination. And no, FBI does not release all their evidence and before the trial and no, not even if Candace wants to do "her own investigation"

So you can focus on the bullet at the trial when all the evidence is presented and Tyler Robinson has a chance to demolish the evidence if he can. And if you think the judge was unfair and did not preside over a fair trial (which is very possible) then you can bring it up and we can discuss it. Until then, we simply dont have enough to focus on the bullet