I'm acutely aware of how DJT (who I respect) lumped these four together...almost like he was trying to build them up as a group with their commonalities (their audiences can be vastly different, but they are bonding now!). Calling them out repeatedly also brought more awareness to what they're saying regarding America first - the Streisand effect, if you will.
Tucker, Megyn, Candace, and Alex don't care that they aren't invited on TV because it's irrelevant to them and their audience. The generations that follow these podcasters are the younger generations which care nothing about broadcast news; it's anathema to them. Networks are not a source of information for their viewers.
And DJTs hypocrisy in this post seems to have been missed by many as he claims CNNs 100% approval rating just before calling out the "Fake News CNN" in the same post. This is an obvious dog whistle that most of GAW failed to hear. DJT has told us in this post that the networks are sh!t and the podcasters have the floor.
What do woke left and woke right have in common? A lot, including using words like "dog whistle". Something to think about.
Oh and the CNN 100% rating is obviously fake. No one ever has 100% rating. They pushed that narrative hoping it would lull Trump into complacency for midterms, and thats why he keeps saying it all the time. Trolling and lulling at the same time, like only he can do, and Anons used to be able to enjoy these stuff in the past until their IDS took over and drove them to get brainwashed by disinformation narratives.
I agree with you that the CNN rating is fake, which is exactly why Trump claiming the poll as a win in the same post he calls them Fake News CNN is a signal to those who are listening that the "third rate podcasters" who are, in reality, highly ranked podcasters worthy of attention.
The bigger story here is that Trump needs the support of Israel (who is well-loved by much of the population of Iran) while he has us at war with Iran. These podcasters are being consistent with their opinion on wars. I completely respect that stance. Trump needs enough support for this war, so he's differentiating himself from the podcasters BY CLAIMING THEY CAN'T GET INTERVIEWS ON THE FAKE NEWS THAT HE HATES.
Please tell me I'm not the only one here who gets this.
These podcasters are being consistent with their opinion on wars
I am curious, have you been able to find out what Candace's stance on war has been? I havent been able to find anytime she talked about wars before the Iran strikes.
But what I find concerning is not the stance of wars as such (whether you want to specifically focus on "forever wars" or "starting new wars vs Iran war being 47 years old and dormant by design") but the fact that whatever their stance is leads them to praise Islamists, praise Sharia laws, call for a NWO lead by China and Russia etc.
Its hard to evaluate an idea by itself (like equality, diversity, conservation etc) until you see where there ideas lead you
I'm acutely aware of how DJT (who I respect) lumped these four together...almost like he was trying to build them up as a group with their commonalities (their audiences can be vastly different, but they are bonding now!). Calling them out repeatedly also brought more awareness to what they're saying regarding America first - the Streisand effect, if you will.
Tucker, Megyn, Candace, and Alex don't care that they aren't invited on TV because it's irrelevant to them and their audience. The generations that follow these podcasters are the younger generations which care nothing about broadcast news; it's anathema to them. Networks are not a source of information for their viewers.
And DJTs hypocrisy in this post seems to have been missed by many as he claims CNNs 100% approval rating just before calling out the "Fake News CNN" in the same post. This is an obvious dog whistle that most of GAW failed to hear. DJT has told us in this post that the networks are sh!t and the podcasters have the floor.
What do woke left and woke right have in common? A lot, including using words like "dog whistle". Something to think about.
Oh and the CNN 100% rating is obviously fake. No one ever has 100% rating. They pushed that narrative hoping it would lull Trump into complacency for midterms, and thats why he keeps saying it all the time. Trolling and lulling at the same time, like only he can do, and Anons used to be able to enjoy these stuff in the past until their IDS took over and drove them to get brainwashed by disinformation narratives.
I agree with you that the CNN rating is fake, which is exactly why Trump claiming the poll as a win in the same post he calls them Fake News CNN is a signal to those who are listening that the "third rate podcasters" who are, in reality, highly ranked podcasters worthy of attention.
The bigger story here is that Trump needs the support of Israel (who is well-loved by much of the population of Iran) while he has us at war with Iran. These podcasters are being consistent with their opinion on wars. I completely respect that stance. Trump needs enough support for this war, so he's differentiating himself from the podcasters BY CLAIMING THEY CAN'T GET INTERVIEWS ON THE FAKE NEWS THAT HE HATES.
Please tell me I'm not the only one here who gets this.
u/#q916
I am curious, have you been able to find out what Candace's stance on war has been? I havent been able to find anytime she talked about wars before the Iran strikes.
But what I find concerning is not the stance of wars as such (whether you want to specifically focus on "forever wars" or "starting new wars vs Iran war being 47 years old and dormant by design") but the fact that whatever their stance is leads them to praise Islamists, praise Sharia laws, call for a NWO lead by China and Russia etc.
Its hard to evaluate an idea by itself (like equality, diversity, conservation etc) until you see where there ideas lead you