Extrapolation: Shingle Algorithm – Who & Why Who: NYSBOE and contractors (Saber Corp primary) during 2005–2007 HAVA-mandated NYSVoter rollout. Structured SBOEIDs were batch-generated at state level while migrating legacy county data. Why (most insightful facts): 1. Benign view: Scalable ID assignment in rushed centralization/deduping of millions of purged records – likely batch-logic artifact for partitioning or audit controls. 2. Researchers' view: Patterns far too precise (99%+ purged/clone correlation) and non-random to be accidental. Functions as hidden steganographic tagging, creating a "shadow" pool of structured records (born purged, mismatched dates) that could be reactivated independently. Similar algorithmic designs found in multiple states. No NYSBOE explanation exists; structure verifiable in public voter files. Bottom line: Deliberately engineered into the HAVA database architecture. Efficiency vs. covert classification remains the open question.
This is incredible, but indeed, it is the foundation on which the whole system is build: database integrity.
Is what is being looked at, actually fact or manipulated? It puts the spotlight on the whole building of elections. Especially, in those countries where the idea is that voting happens on paper....
Extrapolation: Shingle Algorithm – Who & Why Who: NYSBOE and contractors (Saber Corp primary) during 2005–2007 HAVA-mandated NYSVoter rollout. Structured SBOEIDs were batch-generated at state level while migrating legacy county data. Why (most insightful facts): 1. Benign view: Scalable ID assignment in rushed centralization/deduping of millions of purged records – likely batch-logic artifact for partitioning or audit controls. 2. Researchers' view: Patterns far too precise (99%+ purged/clone correlation) and non-random to be accidental. Functions as hidden steganographic tagging, creating a "shadow" pool of structured records (born purged, mismatched dates) that could be reactivated independently. Similar algorithmic designs found in multiple states. No NYSBOE explanation exists; structure verifiable in public voter files. Bottom line: Deliberately engineered into the HAVA database architecture. Efficiency vs. covert classification remains the open question.
THis is the most damaging rigging evidence I have seen yet! Holy crap.
This is incredible, but indeed, it is the foundation on which the whole system is build: database integrity.
Is what is being looked at, actually fact or manipulated? It puts the spotlight on the whole building of elections. Especially, in those countries where the idea is that voting happens on paper....