What’s to discuss? Either it did or it didn’t. The best way to answer your question would be to search open source. Watch the video to determine which department was in charge of the K-9 unit and search for information from that department that would answer your question.
The question wasn't in ignorance and looking for solution. The question was to get people to realize a point. Lack of its presence on the public site does not prove it is lacking. Lacking a bodycam would make it's own point of slack security.
K, but if you did the research and found out the k9 group for that department uses body cams on their k9s, why not include that information within the “discussion” part of your original remark?
What’s to discuss? Either it did or it didn’t. The best way to answer your question would be to search open source. Watch the video to determine which department was in charge of the K-9 unit and search for information from that department that would answer your question.
Exactly. Thanks for discussing.
....and my guess is you won't be viewing that video, at least anytime soon.
It wasn’t a discussion. I told you how to get an answer to your question.
The question wasn't in ignorance and looking for solution. The question was to get people to realize a point. Lack of its presence on the public site does not prove it is lacking. Lacking a bodycam would make it's own point of slack security.
K, but if you did the research and found out the k9 group for that department uses body cams on their k9s, why not include that information within the “discussion” part of your original remark?