Do you have any articles you can link, to prove your opinion on what Candace should be allowed to discover?

Not opinion, fact. And yes, I can provide you a link

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26

And an excerpt:

(1) Scope in General. Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.

I don't want an answer,

Of course not. You dont want FACTS. You want to pretend FACTS are opinions and opinions are FACTs.

But thanks for one thing though. Watching you people, I now have a lot more sympathy for normies who get brainwashed.