Candace Owens Getting Sued
(www.forbes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (87)
sorted by:
Did it work?
Not sure what you intended to prove with a link to someone's opinion.
Every post or article is an 'opinion' then isn't it? It's the facts used or ignored that determine the veracity, not opinions.
Yes and thats why its very important to read an article, then think about what facts are the article based on, and then verify the sources to confirm that the facts are real.
After that, whether you accept the opinions presented or not depends on your own critical thinking.
This is how we should approach research.
Think about what you said here carefully. Its possible for an article use true facts and yet use logical fallacies to create a false narrative. You always have to use your own critical thinking. No amount of "trust" in anyone or "confirmation bias" is a substitute for critical thinking
He got NO disclosure as anyone who paid attention to the Court TV greement agree.
You gave ZERO proof of discovery and don't seem to know how it works. Your assertion the contrary is false and all you bring to the table is denial and ignorance about the subject.
"Your next reply should be...." ROFL No discussion for YOU!
So how's your research on Court TV, now that I bring up the subject ....again. Ever hear of it? Judge Judy's in the new today. Why don't you report her latest 'decision' which is actually an arranged agreement posing as a legal proceeding.
Note that 'INFOwars' is changing lanes due to Stratfor money being pulled by DOGE. Glad to redpill you, even if it's against your will or ability to understand. Do the work.