I certainly hope Erika Kirk tries to sue her. Just the resulting attention to details should be enough for them to discourage them. You'd know that and WHY only if you knew the details referenced. They're 'sensitive' to those can't sense the coffee.

What will happen? Will there be a trial? Will the burden of proof be on the prosecution to prove (to prove what) or on the defense to 'disprove' (kangaroo court)? Will she get legit discovery? Will it allow peripheral but related, and/or circumstantial, 'sensitive and classified' information? Be sure to detail your answers.

Here's 'my' position. NO Reasons to be explained unfortunately, in the near future. Kind of difficult to explain why something didn't happen, but it takes intellectual fortitude.

Come get some. Your turn