Well, that was disappointing (but thank you for providing it). I have to wonder. The publication was itself short on sauce, complete with unnamed sources, alleged investigations, and a lack of documentation. I noticed elsewhere, it referenced the two self-defense incidents in Minnesota, as though the agents were at fault. The more I turn this over in my thinking, the more I'm inclined to set it on the shelf and see how it ages.
Well, that was disappointing (but thank you for providing it). I have to wonder. The publication was itself short on sauce, complete with unnamed sources, alleged investigations, and a lack of documentation. I noticed elsewhere, it referenced the two self-defense incidents in Minnesota, as though the agents were at fault. The more I turn this over in my thinking, the more I'm inclined to set it on the shelf and see how it ages.