I frankly don't understand the impasse. Why didn't the government make ownership of the IP part of the contract award? That was the usual course of business in my time. In this case, the government owns the other side of the interface, so recompete for the knob. (Sounds like it should be replaced anyway, if it breaks so often under normal use.)
I frankly don't understand the impasse. Why didn't the government make ownership of the IP part of the contract award? That was the usual course of business in my time. In this case, the government owns the other side of the interface, so recompete for the knob. (Sounds like it should be replaced anyway, if it breaks so often under normal use.)