I guess you are right, israel would never be involved in something like that - sheesh, what was i thinking.😀
I’m not exactly supporting massie for re-election personally, or here verbally, just think the whole situation is bizarre and there is much we don’t know.
He was dating TWO women while his wife was very ill.
The woman creating the scandal now, Cynthia West, may be making false charges now about payoffs (although she worked as a Rand Paul staffer--not a complete loon), what is NOT disputed is that she was his side-piece for 2 years while he was married to a sick woman and while he wooed wife #2.
Just pointing out that we don't need to waste energy on defending him when he has very clearly smeared Trump RE: Epstein and been an attention-seeking gadfly for the last 4-5 years.
‘Not disputed’ (?) interesting - wasn’t aware. Do you have sauce on this? I’d take a look. I haven’t followed the scandalous side of this too closely.
You do seem to be making a moral high ground argument against Massie, which is fine ( seriously) however,…..the ‘cheating’….couldn’t one make the same accusations against DJT and former wives? I honestly don’t know all the details and don’t care to dispute, just making a point.
The guy’s voting record and opinion is one thing - it is there for all to see.
"Not disputed" as in "I gave her $5,000 but it wasn't to buy her silence."
He has disputed the "payoff" but doesn't deny the relationship.
Easy to go "moral high ground" bc he continually argues his Conservative "purity" as fealty to the Constitution. There's an element of "moral high ground" to the scandal accusations of a pay-off, but I'm not making that argument bc it's just an accusation so far.
I guess you are right, israel would never be involved in something like that - sheesh, what was i thinking.😀
I’m not exactly supporting massie for re-election personally, or here verbally, just think the whole situation is bizarre and there is much we don’t know.
Yeah, I get that. The main thing is that:
Just pointing out that we don't need to waste energy on defending him when he has very clearly smeared Trump RE: Epstein and been an attention-seeking gadfly for the last 4-5 years.
‘Not disputed’ (?) interesting - wasn’t aware. Do you have sauce on this? I’d take a look. I haven’t followed the scandalous side of this too closely.
You do seem to be making a moral high ground argument against Massie, which is fine ( seriously) however,…..the ‘cheating’….couldn’t one make the same accusations against DJT and former wives? I honestly don’t know all the details and don’t care to dispute, just making a point.
The guy’s voting record and opinion is one thing - it is there for all to see.
"Not disputed" as in "I gave her $5,000 but it wasn't to buy her silence." He has disputed the "payoff" but doesn't deny the relationship.
Easy to go "moral high ground" bc he continually argues his Conservative "purity" as fealty to the Constitution. There's an element of "moral high ground" to the scandal accusations of a pay-off, but I'm not making that argument bc it's just an accusation so far.