I'm curious. What ya'll think?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
AI is a tool that enhances productivity of any person in almost any field if they know how to wield the tool. Enhanced productivity = Ability to access wealth.
Came here to say exactly this - it has increased my productivity at least 10x, if not 50x at times. Anyone can run it on their phone now - there are very capable FREE MODELS. While some 'convenient' and 'smarter' options are available for those who can afford $20/mo - 80%+ of the functionality is available to everyone with a phone right now.
The AI fear-porn is getting tiresome. It is here to stay, and yes, the equivalent of the next industrial revolution. The country that leads it, will lead the world in productivity and innovation. Same goes for the anti-Data Center doomers.
Sounds like I found a smart Anon who has figured out the power of Codex ;)
Every technological innovation creates a big group of people who are scared of it. This is healthy fear. But right now this healthy fear is being turned into a weapon against some MAGA, because the coming AI growth is what will fuel America's freedom and the Great Awakening.
The only way to outrun the bankers is through technological innovations and real economic prosperity. There is simply no other way.
BTW, I would love to have a weekly "tech corner" to discuss how people are using LLMs and to share tips and tricks. I really want more Anons to develop a better understanding of these technologies and not fall for propaganda.
I keep wondering what happened to all those doomers who were screaming the world is going to end with 5G. Oh, I guess they are all busy watching videos on 5G, kek
It depends on the AI. We have an AI on our medical coding encoder and it sucks. It picks up a lot of diagnosis and combines them with other words in the same paragraph to make a combination code. Normally, we have combo codes but only in certain circumstances. I'm guessing the problem with ours is who wrote or programmed it. At this rate, we'll be using humans in medical coding for the foreseeable future. 🤣
Personally, using AI for critical areas should be avoided, unless it has been thoroughly integration-tested under all situations at the same level as any other software in that domain.
Just to give an idea, a medical equipment software. would have undergone all kinds of extreme testing to be certified for medical use. But when a company comes and implements an AI tool, the combined use of AI with that specific medical usecase would not have been undergone even a fraction of the testing.
Yep,using humans in medical coding is the smart thing to do for a while.
AI could be argued within the same field as gun rights as far as that goes. (That could get some people riled up kek)
I'm honestly pretty indifferent on the topic. I tend to take the side of your statement but I'm aware of the concerns others have voiced. Exactly the feedback I had hoped for when making this post.
great for those that use it wisely to enhance.
problem is, it is used very much by those too lazy to do any real work. creating a generation of non skilled that have no critical thinking ability. they have no forethought for anything new. no reason to think when they can just 'plug in'?
where will the innovators come from ?
This is the same with every technology. When Internet originally became thing late 90s, most people started using it for fun. Mostly bulletin boards, ICQs and stuff.
Yet there were those who decided to do serious stuff and build tech and companies.
This is the story of Mankind. Roughly 10% of people will innovate. 50% of people will contribute if given specific goals. The rest simply follow. Thats just the way we are. Thats why Jesus was called Good Shepherd. People being "sheep" by itself is not the problem, its whom they decide to follow.
Hoepfully after the Great Awakening, the 10% who innovate will always keep in mind the lessons from this period and ensure that every innovation is done with the freedom of mankind in mind. The remaining 90% also should remember not to blindly follow, but question when choices are made that are wrong.