If you read your own comment carefully you will identify the hierarchy.
British gave Israel to Rothschilds (not entirely accurate, but will suffice for this arguement).
In this structure, British are the owners, Israel is the object and Rothschilds are the subject endowed with the object.
Israel indeed is a creation of the British (much like America itself), and like all creations, it was created with intentional wedges and strings to control it. In case of Israel, the wedge was the Palestine. (Rothschild own Israel, according to you. Rockefellers who were agents of Rothschilds created UN. UN created the Palestine problem. This was not an accident), and with this, it became a powerful asset for the British (more specifically the City of London).
Trump architected the Abraham accords - which normalized relations with many of the important the Arab countries with Israel. Each normalization cut a string. This is how Trump cut a lot of strings and allowed the factions within Israel that wants peace to take control from the factions that pushed forever wars.
Oct 7 happened when Saudi was getting ready to sign Abraham accords. This would have essentially tilted the balance against Iran and would have ended the middle east forever war.
It was only after Trump got the Abraham accords that suddenly it became acceptable, if not fashionable, to hate Israel and Jews on the social media. People mistook this for "Awakening", when it fact it was a controlled burn of an asset that was already turning against its masters in the City.
British gave Israel to Rothschilds (not entirely accurate, but will suffice for this arguement).
Sorta ... but not really.
It looks that way on paper. But the jews used their influence in both Britain and the USA to help Britain win WW1 against the Germans.
Germany was winning. They offered a peace deal to Britain. The jews, in the background, got the Balfour Declaration deal done, which brought the USA into the war. That was enough to help Britain win.
So sure, let's say that Britain "gave" Palestine to the jews. But that was only done to carry through on what the jews had helped them with in getting the USA into the war. Otherwise, Germany would have won.
In this structure, British are the owners, Israel is the object and Rothschilds are the subject endowed with the object.
Again ... on paper.
This is similar to the structure of the Federal Reserve.
The Chairman of the FR is appointed by the President. But once confirmed, the President has no power.
The power of the FR is their ability to manipulate the money supply -- both expanding and contracting so as to manipulate the economy. And since the insiders already know ahead of time what they will do, they can position themselves financially to become wealthy off of their moves.
The money supply manipulation is done through their Open Market Operations.
The OMO's are done ONLY at the New York branch of the FR. No other branch has any say in this. And since it is the primary power of the FR, the New York branch is really where the power is.
This is why the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is the ONLY position that has a permanent seat at the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), when they discuss interest rate "policy."
And THIS guy is the one who runs the OMO's to manipulate the money supply.
I would speculate, since this information is a closely-guarded secret, that the New York Fed president doesn't even have the power over the OMO's. He might sign off on it, officially, but I would bet that there are other people behind the scenes that actually call the shots.
After all, the STRUCTURE of the Federal Reserve started out in 1913 as a trust, which had owners who were the Rothschild and Rockefeller puppets.
There is no reason to believe that they ever gave up REAL power behind the scenes just because the legal structure and framework changed over the years.
So ...
While something can LOOK like one thing on paper, it might ACTUALLY BE something else when certain people make certain decisions that everyone else must follow.
Israel ... was created with intentional wedges and strings to control it.
Exactly my point!
... it became a powerful asset for the British (more specifically the City of London).
I don't believe that someone like King Charles has any REAL power. He is a left-over figurehead from a bygone era.
The City of London certainly does have a lot of power, but I am skeptical that a lot of BRITISH people have the real power.
Maybe they do, and maybe they don't. That kind of power does not advertise itself to the public.
It stays hidden.
What is on paper is often ... makebelieve.
If you are interested, look up the document that was the Standard Oil Trust (1892, I think).
I don't have a handy citation for it at the moment.
Reading through it, you will see that there were hundreds of oil companies, all ultimately either owned or controled by the Standard Oil Trust.
This is why it was a monopoly, although to the general public it looked like a lot of competing gas companies.
The trust document showed that the Board of Trustees were named, and then elections for board members would happen every few years.
Rockfeller was on the Board. I believe that he also had written side agreements done in such a way that he actually controlled everything behind the scenes, even though on paper it looked like 9 (if I remember correctly) people had voting power for the trust.
The side agreements, assuming they existed (and why wouldn't they if you were Rockefeller), would have been proxy voting agreements or signed but undated letters of resignation that could be backdated and anyone booted off the board, etc. Many ways to have control without it looking that way.
Own nothing; control everything. -- John D. Rockefeller
Now going on 7th or 8th generation of massive wealth.
And that is probably small compared to the Rothschilds, if they still own most of the banking system.
Thank you. Some people are dredging up everything they can on Massie with long posts to justify their betraying the principle of America First.
We can discipline our own without foreign money.
We need to do better.
Your picture of the power structure is pretty accurate, but I would disagree with assertion that a lot of people make:
So sure, let's say that Britain "gave" Palestine to the jews. But that was only done to carry through on what the jews had helped them with in getting the USA into the war. Otherwise, Germany would have won.
I have read this in every piece about this history, and I have wrote it in my comments in the past as well, as if it were a fact, but when I dug in at some point to find evidence for this assertion, what I found is a very different picture.
The plan for the creation of a state of Israel for Jews were put into motion in mid 1800s with the creation of Palestine Exploration Fund between the monarchy and the Rothschilds. This was not an after thought nor simply a transaction for helping British win against Germany.
Nazi Germany was a carefully created construct, funded by the city of london via their agent Hajalmaar Schaacht who Hitler specifically chose to be his central banker. The City was never in fear of losing control of machinery. The Nazis were created to take down Stalin, since Stalin was the one who cut lose from the City and started creating havoc to their plans. This is why Hitler chose to move against USSR rather than Britain first, and even allowed the British troops to escape inexplicably.
In America, there was great animosity against Jews who would try to convince people that America should enter the war, even resorting to violence. Jews never changed American minds to enter the war. Hence the elaborate ploy of provoking Japan.
FDR was incredibly clued in on the central bankers ability to create trouble and understood that nazis were their puppets. He and Stalin shared this clarity and hence the lend lease program to ensure Stalin would not be taken down by the Nazis. He already wanted to enter the war not for the Jews, but to stop the City backed wrecking ball in Europe. Hence he resorted (as mentioned before) to provoking the Japanese.
When Hitler asked permission from the president of Bank of England regarding allowing Jews to make deposit of their assets and leave Germany, he was expressly forbidden to allow them to emigrate anywhere else except Palestine and Hitler agreed to this. The City never cared nor owed anything to the Jews. They used the ordinary Jews ("Lesser Brethren" from the Protocols) purely as pawns to establish a conflict base in middle east.
None of this supports the idea that Israel was "given to the Jews" but rather Israel was a very meticulously planned construct, using Jews as pawns, for the furthering of the Great Game.
If you read your own comment carefully you will identify the hierarchy.
British gave Israel to Rothschilds (not entirely accurate, but will suffice for this arguement).
In this structure, British are the owners, Israel is the object and Rothschilds are the subject endowed with the object.
Israel indeed is a creation of the British (much like America itself), and like all creations, it was created with intentional wedges and strings to control it. In case of Israel, the wedge was the Palestine. (Rothschild own Israel, according to you. Rockefellers who were agents of Rothschilds created UN. UN created the Palestine problem. This was not an accident), and with this, it became a powerful asset for the British (more specifically the City of London).
Trump architected the Abraham accords - which normalized relations with many of the important the Arab countries with Israel. Each normalization cut a string. This is how Trump cut a lot of strings and allowed the factions within Israel that wants peace to take control from the factions that pushed forever wars.
Oct 7 happened when Saudi was getting ready to sign Abraham accords. This would have essentially tilted the balance against Iran and would have ended the middle east forever war.
It was only after Trump got the Abraham accords that suddenly it became acceptable, if not fashionable, to hate Israel and Jews on the social media. People mistook this for "Awakening", when it fact it was a controlled burn of an asset that was already turning against its masters in the City.
Sorta ... but not really.
It looks that way on paper. But the jews used their influence in both Britain and the USA to help Britain win WW1 against the Germans.
Germany was winning. They offered a peace deal to Britain. The jews, in the background, got the Balfour Declaration deal done, which brought the USA into the war. That was enough to help Britain win.
So sure, let's say that Britain "gave" Palestine to the jews. But that was only done to carry through on what the jews had helped them with in getting the USA into the war. Otherwise, Germany would have won.
Again ... on paper.
This is similar to the structure of the Federal Reserve.
The Chairman of the FR is appointed by the President. But once confirmed, the President has no power.
The power of the FR is their ability to manipulate the money supply -- both expanding and contracting so as to manipulate the economy. And since the insiders already know ahead of time what they will do, they can position themselves financially to become wealthy off of their moves.
The money supply manipulation is done through their Open Market Operations.
The OMO's are done ONLY at the New York branch of the FR. No other branch has any say in this. And since it is the primary power of the FR, the New York branch is really where the power is.
This is why the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is the ONLY position that has a permanent seat at the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), when they discuss interest rate "policy."
And THIS guy is the one who runs the OMO's to manipulate the money supply.
I would speculate, since this information is a closely-guarded secret, that the New York Fed president doesn't even have the power over the OMO's. He might sign off on it, officially, but I would bet that there are other people behind the scenes that actually call the shots.
After all, the STRUCTURE of the Federal Reserve started out in 1913 as a trust, which had owners who were the Rothschild and Rockefeller puppets.
There is no reason to believe that they ever gave up REAL power behind the scenes just because the legal structure and framework changed over the years.
So ...
While something can LOOK like one thing on paper, it might ACTUALLY BE something else when certain people make certain decisions that everyone else must follow.
Exactly my point!
I don't believe that someone like King Charles has any REAL power. He is a left-over figurehead from a bygone era.
The City of London certainly does have a lot of power, but I am skeptical that a lot of BRITISH people have the real power.
Maybe they do, and maybe they don't. That kind of power does not advertise itself to the public.
It stays hidden.
What is on paper is often ... makebelieve.
If you are interested, look up the document that was the Standard Oil Trust (1892, I think).
I don't have a handy citation for it at the moment.
Reading through it, you will see that there were hundreds of oil companies, all ultimately either owned or controled by the Standard Oil Trust.
This is why it was a monopoly, although to the general public it looked like a lot of competing gas companies.
The trust document showed that the Board of Trustees were named, and then elections for board members would happen every few years.
Rockfeller was on the Board. I believe that he also had written side agreements done in such a way that he actually controlled everything behind the scenes, even though on paper it looked like 9 (if I remember correctly) people had voting power for the trust.
The side agreements, assuming they existed (and why wouldn't they if you were Rockefeller), would have been proxy voting agreements or signed but undated letters of resignation that could be backdated and anyone booted off the board, etc. Many ways to have control without it looking that way.
Now going on 7th or 8th generation of massive wealth.
And that is probably small compared to the Rothschilds, if they still own most of the banking system.
Thank you. Some people are dredging up everything they can on Massie with long posts to justify their betraying the principle of America First. We can discipline our own without foreign money. We need to do better.
Your picture of the power structure is pretty accurate, but I would disagree with assertion that a lot of people make:
I have read this in every piece about this history, and I have wrote it in my comments in the past as well, as if it were a fact, but when I dug in at some point to find evidence for this assertion, what I found is a very different picture.
The plan for the creation of a state of Israel for Jews were put into motion in mid 1800s with the creation of Palestine Exploration Fund between the monarchy and the Rothschilds. This was not an after thought nor simply a transaction for helping British win against Germany.
Nazi Germany was a carefully created construct, funded by the city of london via their agent Hajalmaar Schaacht who Hitler specifically chose to be his central banker. The City was never in fear of losing control of machinery. The Nazis were created to take down Stalin, since Stalin was the one who cut lose from the City and started creating havoc to their plans. This is why Hitler chose to move against USSR rather than Britain first, and even allowed the British troops to escape inexplicably.
In America, there was great animosity against Jews who would try to convince people that America should enter the war, even resorting to violence. Jews never changed American minds to enter the war. Hence the elaborate ploy of provoking Japan.
FDR was incredibly clued in on the central bankers ability to create trouble and understood that nazis were their puppets. He and Stalin shared this clarity and hence the lend lease program to ensure Stalin would not be taken down by the Nazis. He already wanted to enter the war not for the Jews, but to stop the City backed wrecking ball in Europe. Hence he resorted (as mentioned before) to provoking the Japanese.
When Hitler asked permission from the president of Bank of England regarding allowing Jews to make deposit of their assets and leave Germany, he was expressly forbidden to allow them to emigrate anywhere else except Palestine and Hitler agreed to this. The City never cared nor owed anything to the Jews. They used the ordinary Jews ("Lesser Brethren" from the Protocols) purely as pawns to establish a conflict base in middle east.
None of this supports the idea that Israel was "given to the Jews" but rather Israel was a very meticulously planned construct, using Jews as pawns, for the furthering of the Great Game.