I can show, beyond any reasonable doubt (if you bother to read my book), that all information has been completely controlled pretty much for forever (since the Roman Empire at least). All publishers have been completely controlled (see Jakob Fugger and his creation of what we call "media" and his domination of the printing press and printers guild). This control has existed completely the whole time, and anyone who investigates it finds exactly that: a Banker Cabal controls everything using control of information and controlled opposition (both "for" and "against" paid for by the same Banker Cabal once you dig into the money trail). We try so hard to believe that things are organic because it's an easier pill to swallow than the alternative. Investigation proves otherwise.
In the case of books, if any publication (which is completely controlled by the media) was pushed to the public (a "book review" e.g.) it was done by the media which was also completely controlled. Every newspaper was controlled. Every "book review" was controlled. Whether it was organic or intentional, it was allowed by the Control System.
If something happens that is not allowed (the The Protocols of the Elders of Zion e.g.), it is stamped down into oblivion. The person who stamped down the Protocols e.g. was a person called Allen Dulles (in 1921). Allen Dulles (at the time) was a top level Rockefeller lawyer (who helped him take over South America). He, along with Rockefeller (and others) cocreated the CFR (at the same time), then the OSS, and eventually the CIA. As an agent of Rockefeller, in a NYT 1921 (iirc) paper (also owned by Rockefeller and Morgan) he stamped down The Protocols definitively by "debunking" it. His "authoritative report", stopped all people from allowing themselves to read it or talk about it in fear of being called an "anti-semite" (a phrase created by Rothschild to ensure a specific narrative which led to and guided WWI, WWII, the state of Isreal, the UN, the Cold War and eventually "The Matrix").
The only reason anyone even read it widespread to begin with was because it was pushed by a controlled opposition publisher. Did it start as a true opposition? Possibly. Probably imo. But it became widespread once it became big enough to matter. It became an effort of controlled opposition as soon as it had any meaningful readership. Then by pushing it bigger, they had a big enough audience to stamp it down into oblivion.
That is how controlled opposition works. That is shown, in gory detail, time and time again once you follow the money and the Board of Directors (the men behind the curtain).
The way to read history is to understand what actually happened (e.g. the Protocols were shut down by contrivance by an "authority" but ultimately controlled by both sides). Learn how to ignore "who was doing what for the obvious reasons." The money and the financial and family ties prove it's all controlled opposition. The House always wins because they control everything as soon as it matters to become meaningful.
The only reason anyone even read it wi despread to begin with was because it was pushed by a controlled opposition publisher.
You do realize like movies of today it was a kids book? And opposition , controlled or otherwise , must use truth to slip their lies in and some can distinguish between the two.
The House always wins because they control everything... until they don't and is why progress comes in fits and starts
But this sort of Hubris has always been the failing of those who would Gods.
You completely missed my point.
I can show, beyond any reasonable doubt (if you bother to read my book), that all information has been completely controlled pretty much for forever (since the Roman Empire at least). All publishers have been completely controlled (see Jakob Fugger and his creation of what we call "media" and his domination of the printing press and printers guild). This control has existed completely the whole time, and anyone who investigates it finds exactly that: a Banker Cabal controls everything using control of information and controlled opposition (both "for" and "against" paid for by the same Banker Cabal once you dig into the money trail). We try so hard to believe that things are organic because it's an easier pill to swallow than the alternative. Investigation proves otherwise.
In the case of books, if any publication (which is completely controlled by the media) was pushed to the public (a "book review" e.g.) it was done by the media which was also completely controlled. Every newspaper was controlled. Every "book review" was controlled. Whether it was organic or intentional, it was allowed by the Control System.
If something happens that is not allowed (the The Protocols of the Elders of Zion e.g.), it is stamped down into oblivion. The person who stamped down the Protocols e.g. was a person called Allen Dulles (in 1921). Allen Dulles (at the time) was a top level Rockefeller lawyer (who helped him take over South America). He, along with Rockefeller (and others) cocreated the CFR (at the same time), then the OSS, and eventually the CIA. As an agent of Rockefeller, in a NYT 1921 (iirc) paper (also owned by Rockefeller and Morgan) he stamped down The Protocols definitively by "debunking" it. His "authoritative report", stopped all people from allowing themselves to read it or talk about it in fear of being called an "anti-semite" (a phrase created by Rothschild to ensure a specific narrative which led to and guided WWI, WWII, the state of Isreal, the UN, the Cold War and eventually "The Matrix").
The only reason anyone even read it widespread to begin with was because it was pushed by a controlled opposition publisher. Did it start as a true opposition? Possibly. Probably imo. But it became widespread once it became big enough to matter. It became an effort of controlled opposition as soon as it had any meaningful readership. Then by pushing it bigger, they had a big enough audience to stamp it down into oblivion.
That is how controlled opposition works. That is shown, in gory detail, time and time again once you follow the money and the Board of Directors (the men behind the curtain).
The way to read history is to understand what actually happened (e.g. the Protocols were shut down by contrivance by an "authority" but ultimately controlled by both sides). Learn how to ignore "who was doing what for the obvious reasons." The money and the financial and family ties prove it's all controlled opposition. The House always wins because they control everything as soon as it matters to become meaningful.
I didn't miss your point /paranoia.
You do realize like movies of today it was a kids book? And opposition , controlled or otherwise , must use truth to slip their lies in and some can distinguish between the two.
But this sort of Hubris has always been the failing of those who would Gods.