Excellent... Step forward into the light, minions, and let everyone see who you are.

Both Manasco and Moorer were nominated by PDJT. Not sure if they're rinos or if they legitimately think that the timing of the constitutionally-sound redistricting is too "confusing" for the voters. (A repeated theme in some of the articles I've perused on this). The third judge, Marcus, appointed by Slick Willy, appears to be strongly pro-lgbxyz. You can go look at the bios for each on wiki, but the below sentence is from the "Notable cases" section of Marcus's bio.

"... In 2004, Marcus dissented when the court refused to rehear a case where the initial panel upheld a law banning LGBTQ couples from adopting children. ..."

There are decent, non-pedophile LGB+ parents who've adopted and raised their children, so not to denigrate them or paint them with a broad brush including pedos, but it's a notable leftist-oriented judicial stance and with so many horror stories coming out of abused adopted children in that community, it raises a red flag these days where activist leftist judges are considered. These activist leftist judges are currently releasing hardcore, violent criminals and pedophiles back out on the streets to reoffend and terrorize communities so one has to wonder if they care about citizens' rights and safety or if they're in line with marxist strategies to destroy the country from within.

.

From the below-linked article...

"... The judges, U.S. District Judge Anna Manasco, U.S. District Judge Terry Moorer, appointed by President Donald Trump; and U.S. Circuit Judge Stanley Marcus, appointed by former President Bill Clinton, wrote in the 79-page opinion that the state’s argument contradicted its arguments made in 2023, and said that its 2023 map “made it impossible not only to remediate the vote dilution we identified, but also to respect the longstanding community of interest the Legislature identified in Alabama’s Black Belt.” ..."

It looks to me like a clear violation of color-blind justice as they're attempting to make accomodations for a racial group (perhaps to the detriment of another racial group) where representation is concerned. If THIS is their argument, perhaps they should do some soul-searching and ask themselves if they'd be okay with a "White Belt". Blatantly racist, IMO. We have citizens of all races and they shouldn't be carved up into racial "districts". The demonrats just can't seem to relinquish their plantation mentality - keep 'em corralled in a geographic area so they're easier to "control"/manipulate with targeted, deceptive messaging.

.

https://alabamareflector.com/2026/05/26/federal-judges-block-alabamas-use-of-2023-congressional-map/