We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.
I'm curious what everyone thinks about this last line? What could it mean to be the public face of Q? Is it truly that or just claiming to be that?
There seem to be a lot of Podcasters that have a far greater reach, and so few people know about this site?
How do you think the Q teams feels about such a strong statement?
Because this site used to get hundreds of thousands of engagement and hundreds of active users got banned over stupid shit and left. Now it's a handfull echo chamber, and I told them this would happen.
Arbitrary bans over stupid shit killed this site. Man I miss voat
I believe it's meant to test endurance and ego. Those (most)that are here are here because they feel called to be here. Lots can change very quickly. Those that left because of bans most likely had some pride issues they needed to sort out. It reminds me of a digital boot camp. Numbers aren't always everything imo
I believe we have the greatest mods and admin words the whole Internet
The Donald provides a safety net where things are a little more open to talk about.
meh
I don't think getting a ban should make people leave. Many came here wanting to post whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted. Bans can be a good way to test ego and see who is serious about being here and being part of a larger picture..
It reminds me of the Drill Instructors yelling at you In boot camp. At first its like...who do they think they are, why are they so mean and evil. Eventually you begin to understand it's all part of the growing process..
I've seen bans you wouldn't believe