I could say the same for you. Im not saying that there is no issue with trafficking. Im saying the much larger issue is the ideology that led there. I think it is more important to find the arsonist than to put out one of the fires.
I just don't understand the need for a false dichotomy here.
But if you must, I will concede that in the grander scheme, putting out all of the fires and stopping anyone who starts fires is indeed more important than stopping a single fire.
You insist on missing my point. I don't disagree with you that voting for the import of rapists is a bad thing.
I find it difficult to believe that you can't hold more than one truth in your head at once on this matter but it is what it is.
I could say the same for you. Im not saying that there is no issue with trafficking. Im saying the much larger issue is the ideology that led there. I think it is more important to find the arsonist than to put out one of the fires.
I just don't understand the need for a false dichotomy here.
But if you must, I will concede that in the grander scheme, putting out all of the fires and stopping anyone who starts fires is indeed more important than stopping a single fire.
Anywayyy, both need to be done.
We dont have enough resources to put out every fire. Stopping the fire starters should be prioritized.
Exactly. And when do we "prioritize"? When there is more than one thing to be done. Whew. That was painful but we got there. Lol.