https ://www.lawdork.com/p/dojs-fight-against-trans-medical
After Perloff had argued to Lamberth about the uncontroverted view of medical associations about the value of gender-affirming medical care, Littman repeatedly insisted that wasn’t true — primarily citing a handful of court opinions saying so and relying on Trump administration-related policy developments.
“It is controverted,” Littman insisted.
Although that sounded weak on Wednesday, that was enough for Roberts when rational basis was applied to the law at issue in Skrmetti. “Tennessee concluded that there is an ongoing debate among medical experts,“ he wrote.1 In other words, manufactured debate is still a debate.
“manufactured debate is still a debate”?
except, its the trans rights advocates who are manufacturing the debate, by asserting themselves into existence, and presenting the world with a list of demands…
theres nothing “manufactured” about the pushback,
but the idea that every medical expert in the world agrees with trans narratives… is manufactured
A prisoner has NO right to trans medical care in prison.
They have rights to protection against cruel punishment, discrimination, and denial of basic medical care... and certain legal rights.
Basic medical care doesn't include trans-medical care. If NOBODY in prison is allowed trans-medical care, then it's not discriminatory or a punishment... it's just a rule. Nobody gets it... so neither do you.
One group should not have any special status over others.