Iran wants Israel destroyed, because Israel is evidence that Islam is untrue, and flies in the face of Islam's extreme triumphalism: any territory taken by Islamist Fundamentalists has to remain under their control or has to be retaken if lost, according to their doctrine of Islam. (and as a counter point,...) It's also evidence for the truthfulness of the Scriptures, both Antique (Older) and Newer Testaments.
No. None of that is correct. And if somehow Israel (?) has "evidence that Islam is untrue" (???), then they could just release it and devastate the whole world with facts and logic today.
You also didn't actually answer the question: this thread was started by me asserting that the war has given Iran a greater incentive to nuclearize. Do you agree or disagree with that assessment?
It's not that just that Israel has evidence that Islam is not true per se, (though they likely could say they do, in that they maintain the Dead Sea Scrolls and they are older than Islam, and contradict it, while affirming the translation of Scripture (at least to the Greek Septuagint ) is more than 99% verified.) Israel itself is evidence that Islam is not true, because Islam denies the right of other faiths to exist, and denies the Older Testament, and denies Israel's right to exist as a nation under the land covenant given by God.
The evidence for Islam not being true comes more from Christianity than Israel it self, frankly, but the evidence is clear none the less:
If Christianity is true, Islam is not ,due to contradictory claims:
a. Islam claims Jesus is simply a prophet, while Mohammed is claimed as The Prophet, where Christianity claims Jesus as son Of God, and the greatest prophet, priest and king
b. Islam claims 'God has no sons, while Christianity claims Jesus as God's unique son.
c. Christianity claims a resurrection for Jesus, while Islam claims he was taken to heaven and only appeared to have died (contrary to at least one eye-witness
, John)
d. There are no direct eye witnesses to Mohammed's being The Prophet, while there were 500 witnesses to Jesus' ascension to heaven, after His death, burial, and resurrection.
e. Judaism shares some beliefs with Christianity that are not shared by Islam.
A belief that Isaac was the promised one and primary heir of Abraham.
A belief that the Older Testament is the inspired Word of God - Islam holds that the Older and Newer Testaments are corrupted, and only the Koran is not
No, they weren't. What it says is that they have nuclear material. It can be used for a variety of purposes, but what is probably the most likely purpose is the Japan strategy of having the components of a nuclear weapon available to make if they are threatened, but without actually making one or certainly, using one. Please stick to facts: the UN did not declare that Iran were developing or had a nuclear weapon.
It's not that just that Israel has evidence that Islam is not true per se
Dude, this is what you wrote above! This is why I have to preface my comment with point out how I'm trying to take you in good faith, but you instantly misrepresented a source and then directly contradicted what you wrote before. This is desperate nonsense. The entire argument that Israel existing per se means that Islam is not true genuinely beggars belief as well. There has never been anyone in history who said, "Yeah, I guess Muhammad wasn't the seal of the prophets since the State of Israel exists". Wild stuff, man.
The stuff about Christianity is obviously irrelevant and like most of your comment is not at all related to the topic, which is that this war has galvanized and legitimized the desire for a nuclear weapon in Iran. If you were Iran, what would you do now? Would you think, "Well, Israel and America will just bomb me at will, so I guess I'd better not pursue a nuclear weapon, which is the single best deterrent to their aggression?" Of course not. Iranians are rational actors and as much as you want to paint them as some illogical death cult, they are acting in their geopolitical best interests they understand them. They are not motivated by superstition or mental illness or revanchism, but basic existential dread and a desire to come out ahead on the negotiations.
How does this relate to Iran being incentivized to have a nuclear arsenal?
Iran wants Israel destroyed, because Israel is evidence that Islam is untrue, and flies in the face of Islam's extreme triumphalism: any territory taken by Islamist Fundamentalists has to remain under their control or has to be retaken if lost, according to their doctrine of Islam. (and as a counter point,...) It's also evidence for the truthfulness of the Scriptures, both Antique (Older) and Newer Testaments.
No. None of that is correct. And if somehow Israel (?) has "evidence that Islam is untrue" (???), then they could just release it and devastate the whole world with facts and logic today.
You also didn't actually answer the question: this thread was started by me asserting that the war has given Iran a greater incentive to nuclearize. Do you agree or disagree with that assessment?
I disagree, because according to the UN, they already were!: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZVknqg2/un-inspectors-admit-that-iran-ha/
see also my comment, in thread, here: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZVknqg2/x/c/4eblo7jHStB
It's not that just that Israel has evidence that Islam is not true per se, (though they likely could say they do, in that they maintain the Dead Sea Scrolls and they are older than Islam, and contradict it, while affirming the translation of Scripture (at least to the Greek Septuagint ) is more than 99% verified.) Israel itself is evidence that Islam is not true, because Islam denies the right of other faiths to exist, and denies the Older Testament, and denies Israel's right to exist as a nation under the land covenant given by God.
The evidence for Islam not being true comes more from Christianity than Israel it self, frankly, but the evidence is clear none the less:
If Christianity is true, Islam is not ,due to contradictory claims:
a. Islam claims Jesus is simply a prophet, while Mohammed is claimed as The Prophet, where Christianity claims Jesus as son Of God, and the greatest prophet, priest and king
b. Islam claims 'God has no sons, while Christianity claims Jesus as God's unique son.
c. Christianity claims a resurrection for Jesus, while Islam claims he was taken to heaven and only appeared to have died (contrary to at least one eye-witness , John)
d. There are no direct eye witnesses to Mohammed's being The Prophet, while there were 500 witnesses to Jesus' ascension to heaven, after His death, burial, and resurrection.
e. Judaism shares some beliefs with Christianity that are not shared by Islam.
A belief that Isaac was the promised one and primary heir of Abraham.
A belief that the Older Testament is the inspired Word of God - Islam holds that the Older and Newer Testaments are corrupted, and only the Koran is not
FMI: https://search.brave.com/search?q=what+are+the+contradictory+claims+of+Islam+and+Christianity&summary=1&conversation=09287f567ba155ba17f7870d2c8f5f4db880
Strong Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus can be found in several places, but here are a few of my favorite links:
https://medium.com/@tudor.onutu/my-personal-evidence-list-for-christianity-6be9c552c50c
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/earliest-evidence-christianity/
https://www.bethinking.org/is-christianity-true/the-evidence-for-christianity
https://salt.london/articles/five-reasons-why-theres-more-evidence-for-christianity-than-you-think/
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/14780
https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/the-christian-faith-is-an-evidential-faith/ This whole site gives the evidence for Christianity, but this link explains why that is true.
I'll assume good faith here.
No, they weren't. What it says is that they have nuclear material. It can be used for a variety of purposes, but what is probably the most likely purpose is the Japan strategy of having the components of a nuclear weapon available to make if they are threatened, but without actually making one or certainly, using one. Please stick to facts: the UN did not declare that Iran were developing or had a nuclear weapon.
Not sure what your point is.
Dude, this is what you wrote above! This is why I have to preface my comment with point out how I'm trying to take you in good faith, but you instantly misrepresented a source and then directly contradicted what you wrote before. This is desperate nonsense. The entire argument that Israel existing per se means that Islam is not true genuinely beggars belief as well. There has never been anyone in history who said, "Yeah, I guess Muhammad wasn't the seal of the prophets since the State of Israel exists". Wild stuff, man.
The stuff about Christianity is obviously irrelevant and like most of your comment is not at all related to the topic, which is that this war has galvanized and legitimized the desire for a nuclear weapon in Iran. If you were Iran, what would you do now? Would you think, "Well, Israel and America will just bomb me at will, so I guess I'd better not pursue a nuclear weapon, which is the single best deterrent to their aggression?" Of course not. Iranians are rational actors and as much as you want to paint them as some illogical death cult, they are acting in their geopolitical best interests they understand them. They are not motivated by superstition or mental illness or revanchism, but basic existential dread and a desire to come out ahead on the negotiations.