It is said that <80.000 is entering the max pain. Well, I would venture a guess here:
To restructure, a flushing out is needed. This was already quite visible when Doge started to really come out of the woodwork and closing down USDAID and other spigots.
Now, it is terrorism financing ....G7 has been put on notice, secondary sanctions are in the air aimed at IRGC. But also think Ukraine, but at a later time, perhaps (interconnected). .... It would not surprise me if old wallets are going to be flushed out.
But my suspicion is that a lot of money is hidden in Monero/ ZEC/ Litecoin/ BCH. Given the congressional testimony of Paccom about BTC and "securing networks", it would not surprise me if there is a mapping, and Bessent is targeting one layer after another.
Zero? No, that would defeat the purpose. See thesis called: Softwar by Space Force Major Jason Lowery. On top: your BTC is safe! That is a promise to be kept by CoC. And given Trump's track record, I see no reason to doubt the end result.
So, how do you flush out, without breaking the China in the cupboard? Max pain. It is all a matter of how do you finance over time. The costs of financing, especially in a low interest environment, is an order of magnitude smaller. 1% of the total costs.
And it would also not surprise me, if several "black-budgets" are being brought to bear.
There is a rational to play around with a concept of access denial in an environment where a supply shock is quite feasible. There are certain mechanism within several larger central exchanges who multiply an applied force: be it a sell or a buy.You get erratic behavior due to overleveraging and rehypothecations.
There are some value gabs that have yet to be resolved.Call it structural imbalances, created by surges. Surges come from floods of money poring in. Money, typically flowing through CoL infrastructure.
58472 -> most likely if a resolution is reached -> it will bounce somewhat and slowly recover. Monies in BTC will flow to Iran rebuilding.
49391 -> not likely; weak point for a bounce
48181 -> potential target. painful but manageable. Veer point. Perhaps even in a violent cascading sell off, like 10-10-25.
29140 -> weak hands sell all.
14117 -> strong hands; total reset. But then ....
Even microstrategy has to strategize around it. If they still can? How about LEDN? their customers won't be happy.
It is said that <80.000 is entering the max pain. Well, I would venture a guess here:
To restructure, a flushing out is needed. This was already quite visible when Doge started to really come out of the woodwork and closing down USDAID and other spigots.
Now, it is terrorism financing ....G7 has been put on notice, secondary sanctions are in the air aimed at IRGC. But also think Ukraine, but at a later time, perhaps (interconnected). .... It would not surprise me if old wallets are going to be flushed out.
But my suspicion is that a lot of money is hidden in Monero/ ZEC/ Litecoin/ BCH. Given the congressional testimony of Paccom about BTC and "securing networks", it would not surprise me if there is a mapping, and Bessent is targeting one layer after another.
Zero? No, that would defeat the purpose. See thesis called: Softwar by Space Force Major Jason Lowery. On top: your BTC is safe! That is a promise to be kept by CoC. And given Trump's track record, I see no reason to doubt the end result.
So, how do you flush out, without breaking the China in the cupboard? Max pain. It is all a matter of how do you finance over time. The costs of financing, especially in a low interest environment, is an order of magnitude smaller. 1% of the total costs.
And it would also not surprise me, if several "black-budgets" are being brought to bear.
There is a rational to play around with a concept of access denial in an environment where a supply shock is quite feasible. There are certain mechanism within several larger central exchanges who multiply an applied force: be it a sell or a buy.You get erratic behavior due to overleveraging and rehypothecations.
Chart analysis perspective: [not gospel;apply salt];DYOFR
There are some value gabs that have yet to be resolved.Call it structural imbalances, created by surges. Surges come from floods of money poring in. Money, typically flowing through CoL infrastructure.
58472 -> most likely if a resolution is reached -> it will bounce somewhat and slowly recover. Monies in BTC will flow to Iran rebuilding. 49391 -> not likely; weak point for a bounce 48181 -> potential target. painful but manageable. Veer point. Perhaps even in a violent cascading sell off, like 10-10-25. 29140 -> weak hands sell all. 14117 -> strong hands; total reset. But then ....
Even microstrategy has to strategize around it. If they still can? How about LEDN? their customers won't be happy.
It would be a great time to buy, though.