IIRC the EO designating cartels and cartel assets as terrorists outlines and presribes asset confiscation and is already in use. The cartels fall under RICO and so do their families, associates, assets, operatives, and basically anybody that got trafficked over the border and agreed to 'work it off' as well. (That would be all the illegals gettin POTUS attention now. 99 percent will be cartel assets payin off debt til they die.)
Maybe. I think by any definition the illegals paying off cartel debt are cartel victims more than rico conspirators. Also, a huge portion of illegals, by far the majority, aren't paying off cartel debt (and the ones that are, don't have bank accounts big enough to matter anyway).
But these are just semantics and potentially differences in timing and degree. The overall movement is to deny illegals' access to banking services, which is needed. So overall it's a good thing. I just don't like headlines like this that exaggerate so much that it's practically lying.
Most of them DO HAVE BANK ACCTS BUT IT IS CARTEL MONEY. Just like they might have a house and car on paper but the cartels own it ie money laundering, long game and it is rigged. Want a good laff some time check out the neighborhood capo keyrings kek
There are millions of illegals who have regular jobs and paychecks with direct deposit who came here to escape the cartels. But believe whatever you want.
IIRC the EO designating cartels and cartel assets as terrorists outlines and presribes asset confiscation and is already in use. The cartels fall under RICO and so do their families, associates, assets, operatives, and basically anybody that got trafficked over the border and agreed to 'work it off' as well. (That would be all the illegals gettin POTUS attention now. 99 percent will be cartel assets payin off debt til they die.)
Maybe. I think by any definition the illegals paying off cartel debt are cartel victims more than rico conspirators. Also, a huge portion of illegals, by far the majority, aren't paying off cartel debt (and the ones that are, don't have bank accounts big enough to matter anyway).
But these are just semantics and potentially differences in timing and degree. The overall movement is to deny illegals' access to banking services, which is needed. So overall it's a good thing. I just don't like headlines like this that exaggerate so much that it's practically lying.
Most of them DO HAVE BANK ACCTS BUT IT IS CARTEL MONEY. Just like they might have a house and car on paper but the cartels own it ie money laundering, long game and it is rigged. Want a good laff some time check out the neighborhood capo keyrings kek
There are millions of illegals who have regular jobs and paychecks with direct deposit who came here to escape the cartels. But believe whatever you want.
I believe you said it all with 'millions of ILLEGALS.' (And way more than 'millions' gotta go.)