Your statement is nothing but anti-"jew hate propaganda." It assumes that there can't possibly be a real organized Jewish component to the Deep State. It makes that assumption as if it were true DESPITE the evidence of the statements of a high ranking military official who might know something about the Deep State. That Colonels statement is ITSELF evidence. Is it sufficient evidence? Of course not. Not even close. But it itself is a piece of evidence and presenting it as if it were not is a lie.

The question you (and everyone else) should be asking is, does a further investigation into the evidence support the premise that there is such a Jewish component to the Deep State?

I mean, if you open your eyes for two seconds you can find ALL SORTS of organizations paid for by Jewish agencies against your assumption (APAC, ADL, SPLC etc.), thus, there is some level of additional supporting evidence. These money trails include both nakedly stating such Jewish payments, or, very commonly, hidden by Jewish shell companies that can be tracked down as uncontroversially Jewish if you look.

So is there a Jewish component to the Deep State? If so, how deeply intertwined is the "Jewish contingent"? Is it all of the Jews, or just a small portion (likely at the very top of the foodchain) that are complicit if it exists? The evidence shown here, even though it is far from a complete record, is in support of those questions. I will leave it to you to decide for yourself if it should be investigated further. But don't pretend that the evidence doesn't exist at all, because that is clearly a false statement.

I won't comment on that further here. All I want to do in this response is show that your statement is an assumption, and there is some level of evidence against the assumption. Putting it as if "there's no evidence here" and then using it as a "faulty generalization" argument (a logical fallacy) is not a reasonable response, but rather, an unreasonable (logically flawed) one.

Instead of relying on the assumption, use it as an hypothesis, then look at the actual evidence, and then decide for yourself. (You know, the method of reasoning AKA logos and critical thinking employed by all investigations into the truth.)

It's not propaganda if it's true

Search for yourself before denying truth.

https://www.gpsmycity.com/attractions/clandestine-immigration-and-naval-museum-29455.html

Second time that you rushed over to post this exact same retard response when a simple search on your part would clear it up. Just like the last time you did it.