Hey Bubble_burst and 1234567whatevs, DO you guys ever notice when you counter the MassHole idiot supporters like 427windsorman with facts that they never have a response? I sure notice and find it funny! MASSIE had his very own juice handler but the Massholes never remember that. "bUt mUh Constitutionalist..."
Ever notice how the ignorant immediately attack anyone that doesn't agree with their opinions? I do not recall saying anything about being a Massie acolyte. I simply stated he was consistently for the Constitution. You know, that document that grants the limited power to government? The document that prohibits government from taking any action not specifically delegated. By your screen name, you took the same oath I did. Perhaps you just never understood the significance of what you took that oath for.
You use "Constitutionalist" as though it were an insult. That is typical of those who are ignorant in regards to the purpose and importance of the Constitution.
Have you ever noticed those that can not argue on facts counter with insults, such as what you just did. I understand every oath I have ever taken! Massie was indeed NOT consistently for the Constitution, the very document I have on my desk and read every week! You are weak, your counter argument is as weak as you are. You argued Massie was a Constitutionalist, he was NOT. I never questioned what you believe in 100% so. Fact check your argument and come back with something valid chief.
You led with "you're weak" and "fact check yourself," so let me put an actual standard on the table instead of trading insults.
My claim was never that Massie voted the way I wanted on every bill. No member does. My claim is that he is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House, and that is metric that is actually measurable.
The groups built to measure fidelity to limited and enumerated government put him at the top. The Republican Liberty Caucus's most recent Liberty Score ranked Massie as the only Republican in the entire House to score 100 or higher. The Club for Growth and Conservative Review run their own scorecards on the same kind of standard, and he rates at or near the top of those as well. That is his recorded voting record measured against constitutional principle, not my opinion.
So here is the fact check, returned. The claim is measurable and the metrics back it. If you have a standard that shows otherwise, name it and post the score. "He wasn't" is not a measure.
And to keep us honest on terms, when I say constitutional I mean voting to keep government inside its delegated powers. If you grade by a broader view of federal authority, you'll score those same votes differently, and then we are arguing definitions, not Massie.
Here is the true issue pal. You can site all of the metrics that show Massie voted for the Constitution. Great. You're correct. The true issue is the clown from Kentucky and his supporters, you the Constitutionalists as you stated must not understand the true enemy and what we are up against. Do you think the Dems, Libs and Deep State follow the Constitution? Do you think your boy Massie knows more about what is going on than TRUMP? Do you believe mASSies voting against TRUMP is the best play to solve all of the issues TRUMP knows about (ie: Deep State) and combat the enemy. Brother, there is only ONE guy that has sacrificed so much of his life and his families life for this nation and that guy is TRUMP! Anyone, like mASSie and those that support him are in the realm of "NORMIE" and are clueless what this movement, what "Q" is all about. "Muh mASSie is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House" Give me a break!
Hey Bubble_burst and 1234567whatevs, DO you guys ever notice when you counter the MassHole idiot supporters like 427windsorman with facts that they never have a response? I sure notice and find it funny! MASSIE had his very own juice handler but the Massholes never remember that. "bUt mUh Constitutionalist..."
Ever notice how the ignorant immediately attack anyone that doesn't agree with their opinions? I do not recall saying anything about being a Massie acolyte. I simply stated he was consistently for the Constitution. You know, that document that grants the limited power to government? The document that prohibits government from taking any action not specifically delegated. By your screen name, you took the same oath I did. Perhaps you just never understood the significance of what you took that oath for.
You use "Constitutionalist" as though it were an insult. That is typical of those who are ignorant in regards to the purpose and importance of the Constitution.
Yes, I AM a Constitutionalist. 100% so.
Have you ever noticed those that can not argue on facts counter with insults, such as what you just did. I understand every oath I have ever taken! Massie was indeed NOT consistently for the Constitution, the very document I have on my desk and read every week! You are weak, your counter argument is as weak as you are. You argued Massie was a Constitutionalist, he was NOT. I never questioned what you believe in 100% so. Fact check your argument and come back with something valid chief.
You led with "you're weak" and "fact check yourself," so let me put an actual standard on the table instead of trading insults.
My claim was never that Massie voted the way I wanted on every bill. No member does. My claim is that he is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House, and that is metric that is actually measurable.
The groups built to measure fidelity to limited and enumerated government put him at the top. The Republican Liberty Caucus's most recent Liberty Score ranked Massie as the only Republican in the entire House to score 100 or higher. The Club for Growth and Conservative Review run their own scorecards on the same kind of standard, and he rates at or near the top of those as well. That is his recorded voting record measured against constitutional principle, not my opinion.
So here is the fact check, returned. The claim is measurable and the metrics back it. If you have a standard that shows otherwise, name it and post the score. "He wasn't" is not a measure.
And to keep us honest on terms, when I say constitutional I mean voting to keep government inside its delegated powers. If you grade by a broader view of federal authority, you'll score those same votes differently, and then we are arguing definitions, not Massie.
Here is the true issue pal. You can site all of the metrics that show Massie voted for the Constitution. Great. You're correct. The true issue is the clown from Kentucky and his supporters, you the Constitutionalists as you stated must not understand the true enemy and what we are up against. Do you think the Dems, Libs and Deep State follow the Constitution? Do you think your boy Massie knows more about what is going on than TRUMP? Do you believe mASSies voting against TRUMP is the best play to solve all of the issues TRUMP knows about (ie: Deep State) and combat the enemy. Brother, there is only ONE guy that has sacrificed so much of his life and his families life for this nation and that guy is TRUMP! Anyone, like mASSie and those that support him are in the realm of "NORMIE" and are clueless what this movement, what "Q" is all about. "Muh mASSie is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House" Give me a break!