For a doctor appointment tomorrow, I was requested to update my information and sign a care consent online. The first item of the consent said, "I understand that a patient's care is directed by his/her attending physician(s) and I consent to any hospital services that are appropriate for my care and as ordered by my physician(s)."
This physician seems pretty good, but what if she thinks vaccines, biologicals or gene therapy are appropriate for my care? She did ask me ONCE if I wanted the sars-cov-2 vaccination, pneumococcal vaccine, herpes zoster (shingles) vaccine and tetanus vaccine. She's also offered a mammogram and dxa scan, which I declined. If she had asked again, I would have found another practitioner.
I have serious trust issues with the (lack of) healthcare field. I will not sign this. The provider (hospital system) has sent it to me about 4 times in the last week.
Specifically, do not sign a Health Monitoring document, at work. Do not confuse this with 'health checks' that are offered as a voluntary 'perk' of the job, which one does not need to sign consent forms for, because to that end, it is just a blood-pressure test with a trainee nurse.
The Globalist trick is to make a list of 'health instruments' back about a decade ago, based on known REALLY dangerous stuff. This was for obvious hazardous things like Asbestos, and other poisonous or radioactive substances. Then, during Covid the shenanigans started: Specifically, Ardern (the lead fish for legal contortions) made it so that they decided that bacterial and viral hazards could also be added to that list. Once one dives in, it is apparent that this is not the case legally, and awake pepes should now be puttin' their foots down. However, councils started monitoring programs for their buidling inspectors - because they go onsite, of course. Very dangerous. /s
Of course, a health instrument must have a specific test associated to it - so for example, one gets regular lung-capacity tests, if it is established that one has been exposed to an unacceptable but measured level. The point is: that the Labour logical dumdums decided that the 'health instrument' was the vaccine. < I actually saw Ardern deliver an impassioned speech about how 'health Instruments' were the way forward to get 'mandates reinforced in workplaces' - Realize it was political goal. Sorry no link.
So, when (they) proceed to shove health monitoring consent forms at one, realize that it is to get you to be vaxxed, just to keep one's job. Also, if they present those documents, it is a very serious issue because in reality it means either: that one has been poisoned by one's job; or it means a vax-mandate - (when the risk is that one is exposed as is a dirty vax-denier). This is a different but very serious issue, because the whole thing is signing one's life, or job away.
DO NOT SIGN IT. The employers actually have no recourse, because if one is not giving one's consent, they will try threats of unempolyment, and that will be illegal. They will still try, but notice that they won't do that on paper. By not signing it, you are not putting yourself on a list of 'damaged goods', if you like. For later. So, when one has retired, and one has a record of covid vax, LOL. Off with his head. Put any other conspiracy theories here. But needs must.
Be aware that there is a minefield of other human rights transgressions along the way, because health monitoring requires a decades-long program to keep an eye on the victim. So, the employer gets access for 40 years, to one's medical records. < and that' is actually what you are signing.