I have theorized along similar lines. the duality also manifests in the Good/Evil paradigm. I believe the Asian yin/yang paradigm also touches upon this. so that at it's fundament, duality is even expressed in our genetic make-up. So for example, just as we cannot have man without woman, we cannot have good without evil - life is suffering, and the evil should teach us to be good - if you get what I mean. This is why the Utopia dreamers are indulging a fantasy, based on a distorted, siloed versions of heaven - it has been extrapolated to mean that heaven, or Utopia, is the only destination (provided you adopt their brand of politics, of course). In Heaven, nobody suffers. Problem is: Hell was always part of the original picture. By pretending that Hell cannot be, the Utopia dreamers are playing at being God, and even God did not manage to remove Lucifer completely (or maybe he never intended to in the first place).
Similarly, one would think that we can't have control without controlled opposition (even as it is an intelligence construct), as the controllers try to control the organic decentralized life via such an artificial mechanism. the problem with this flawed theory is that he organic-ness happens just outside the controller's grasp. [Heeeheee]. The issue here is that the population is awakening to the ruse. Pepes can just about smell the glowing feds these days, when they come online with their narratives. You can gauge the ineffectiveness of the ruse by the speed at which the mocking starts in the comment sections, and the fact that the comment section is controlled in its own right. Censorship is the globalist's last stand.
The true, organic opposition appears subtler, as it is drowned out by the controlled opposition in a virtual world, simply because the latter is louder. However, organic opposition is far more ancient and stronger, as is based on relationships, and what is currently termed networking. You see, the controlled opposition is one-dimensional. It has only one point of control - e.g. Reuters.
For an example of how relationships are the difference: witness how fast FB community groups will rally around the 'right' thing, or how groups can have activists who are mocked openly, or that some arsehole starts doxxing, and then swiftly gets banned.
My point is, the pepes are standing up. As an example of organic resistance, my son recently stopped a bullying session on facebook (would you have?), after he found out that the lady who was being dogpiled (she was a contestant in a beauty pageant) did it for her family - and her father was dying from cancer, so her claim to fame meant a lot to them - pictures of her parents crying because she got into the finals. He flagged the posts which were literally saying that she was ugly (she was not, one of his retaliatory comments was: She is prettier than your wife) and got the ugly behaviour removed, and then he sent the girl a supportive message. Within minutes the ugliness was righted. It was a small step for man and a leap for mankind. Note that he is not a moderator or anything, just a member of the public. So you see, one can turn their censorship into a weapon to fight back. Just make a decent, moral case, and the fat comtollers can't disagree. If FB don't react properly, they will face consequences - just like Noblesse Oblige was a thing. And so, we circle back to the medieval Good/Evil paradigm.
one would think that we can't have control without controlled opposition
the problem with this flawed theory
There is a difference between "can't" and "haven't been able to yet." Your presumption is that I was speaking in "absolutes" (I appreciate a lack of nuance in my rhetoric). Anytime your scope is large enough (a few thousand years of effective total control e.g.), I suggest it is OK to use rhetoric that promotes that "all" because it's close enough to say "all" as makes no nevermind within the scope of the current understanding. Those beyond that understanding generally understand that that absolutism is a tool to impress how bad it really was for them (and is for most everyone else), and that tool is in fact useful, even if there are caveats not noted (which would distort the message).
If you investigate, you find that the entire world (not counting people truly disconnected to the Eurasiatic super continent (including a lot of India and norther Africa)) has been controlled through controlled opposition for at a minimum of 1700 years. (AT A MINIMUM). So when I say "all" or "can't" etc., what I mean is "What has actually happened, on a societal scale" not "what is possible," or "what happened for a couple people or small group who were then suppressed" (murdered or genocided).
The issue here is that the population is awakening to the ruse
Q (assuming they aren't themselves controlled opposition) is proof that it is possible, but if you realize what it took to get there, you would appreciate that it took a couple thousand years of concerted effort (working from the shadows of the shadows using tremendous resources, patience, intelligence, and a few tragic failures) to create a true Awakening (illuminating the shadows to all living in darkness).
However, organic opposition is far more ancient and stronger
I suggest it isn't really "organic" (free in the strictest sense), but rather organized and controlled in the strictest sense. The difference between the Cabal and Q is that their intentions are (I hope, and is supported by the evidence) in actual opposition; a true "other side." They may be working towards that goal (a social structure of truly free People), but to get there, they are far from free or organic. Rather, they must work towards the strictest box to effect their goals. And, since We are an essential part of The Plan, must We similarly be restricted (substantial elaboration below).
We too are "organic" but not really, because we too are working within an allowed box. It's a different box of the Cabal box, but it's still a box. NCSWIC is clearly a "box." Maybe it has a fuzzy boundary (to an extent) but it can't really because we are still controlled (as a society, not for an individual) by the sources of information; the allowed information. (The "memory hole" is a perfect example of a piece of the puzzle that is a true (in a societal scope) Black Hole of controlling information). ALL sources are STILL either created or allowed through the same mechanisms they always have been. The Movie is the same, the Director has changed.
You see, the controlled opposition is one-dimensional. It has only one point of control
This is similar to my previous discussion regarding my rhetoric of "absolutes." But there are really good reasons to believe it is effectively (and completely) true. It isn't that "Reuters" is controlled. It's that ALL "sides" are controlled. I did an exhaustive investigation. My investigation showed, beyond a reasonable doubt, that every single possible path of information was created and/or controlled (funds, board of director connections, shell company connections, explicitly stated intentions, etc.), and it still is. The mechanisms are complete, You are welcome to read my book if you wish. It gives a good start into how that was accomplished (the current version of it), but there is so much still left out (of what I've published so far) that allows for some "reasonable doubts." I assure you, if I do get out the rest, no reasonable doubt of my assertions can remain. EVERYTHING is controlled opposition.
That System still remains. Only the Director has changed, and there is some (intentionally allowed) fringing on the edges.
For an example of how relationships are the difference: witness how fast FB community groups will rally around the 'right' thing, or how groups can have activists who are mocked openly, or that some arsehole starts doxxing, and then swiftly gets banned.
The more you dig, the more you find; ALL of those "examples" are themselves controlled. Even if they begin organically, they are slottedSPECIFICALLY to one of the allowed boxes. So the effect is controlled completely; i.e. inorganic.
This sounds ridiculous until you investigate who controls what; when all of the thousands of allowed boxes (all in "opposition") were created, and for what purpose. The Matrix is COMPLETE. You can't believe it until you see it. Then that's all you can see (you can finally see the Code).
The issue here is that the population is awakening to the ruse. Pepes can just about smell the glowing feds these days
This is not organic, this is slotted to an allowed box. The allowed boxes have been amplified or muted to direct a different society wide group belief system. All of those boxes can be found as "purposefully created" if you dig into the evidence deeply enough. Many of them come from the CIA or DOD exposures, but many come from the creation of boxes from the Church (starting from the very beginning) all the way through today. Look into the Reformation, the Enlightenment, Martin Luther and Jakob Fugger in the early 16th century. Look at how the information was completely controlled by Fugger to create both the "Reformation" and the Catholic Church, benefitting from "both sides."
It's all hidden. These statements look like they are "clearly the opposite of the truth." But the more you dig into the primary sources, the more you find. And it's been going on for forever.
It's a crazy world.
my son recently stopped a bullying session on facebook
This is an example of "organic" ish, but it's meaningless (in a broader scope) until it becomes big enough. And if it becomes big enough, then it's slotted into one or the other "allowed slots" (depending on the desired spin from the Director, usually amplifying/muting one or two or more of the allowed boxes to create a "opposition" effect, all by design to create a "resolution" or "synthesis" (in the "dialectic" sense)). So, is that really "organic" or do you believe it is?
Again, UNTIL YOU DIG INTO IT, it sounds crazy. The world CAN'T be that way.
Until you find overwhelming (unassailable) evidence, and then it's all you can see.
It was a small step for man and a leap for mankind
Why do you think this is taking such a long time? It's certainly not "organic." It's still The Matrix. We just have a different Controller.
one can turn their censorship into a weapon to fight back
By design (and the reason I believe we do in fact have a different Director) the changes of the sizes and shifts of the boxes is to show People that They are the True Authority. That the "government" is a lie trying to exert false Authority over Our Jurisdiction.
Just make a decent, moral case, and the fat comtollers can't disagree
That too can be shown to be not organic but a "New Matrix" design.
Indeed, when you look at it like that, Q is a psyop. One that has been going for thousands of years.
So on the civilizational level: we can't get through the day, without mentioning Rome.
I cannot deny that the Romans brought with them lifestyle and wealth. But their dark underbelly is described clearly in the Bible, in the very beginning of the New Testament. We are for example alerted to the barbaric practice of forcing people to go to the place of birth, to be counted in a census. And at the end of four chapters, we are reminded of the Roman execution practices.
Of course, Roman roads were built so strongly, that many of them are still in use. One has to admire that. They were built for tax-collection and military movement. It's just that people would use them too, for trading. And this created so much wealth that archeologists love 'Roman layers', for the enormous amount of junk. But, this also signals an industrial revolution and enormous wealth - a golden age..
Thus, the recognition that the Military and Civilians both benefit from an upgrade in infrastructure, or whatever.
I have theorized along similar lines. the duality also manifests in the Good/Evil paradigm. I believe the Asian yin/yang paradigm also touches upon this. so that at it's fundament, duality is even expressed in our genetic make-up. So for example, just as we cannot have man without woman, we cannot have good without evil - life is suffering, and the evil should teach us to be good - if you get what I mean. This is why the Utopia dreamers are indulging a fantasy, based on a distorted, siloed versions of heaven - it has been extrapolated to mean that heaven, or Utopia, is the only destination (provided you adopt their brand of politics, of course). In Heaven, nobody suffers. Problem is: Hell was always part of the original picture. By pretending that Hell cannot be, the Utopia dreamers are playing at being God, and even God did not manage to remove Lucifer completely (or maybe he never intended to in the first place).
Similarly, one would think that we can't have control without controlled opposition (even as it is an intelligence construct), as the controllers try to control the organic decentralized life via such an artificial mechanism. the problem with this flawed theory is that he organic-ness happens just outside the controller's grasp. [Heeeheee]. The issue here is that the population is awakening to the ruse. Pepes can just about smell the glowing feds these days, when they come online with their narratives. You can gauge the ineffectiveness of the ruse by the speed at which the mocking starts in the comment sections, and the fact that the comment section is controlled in its own right. Censorship is the globalist's last stand.
The true, organic opposition appears subtler, as it is drowned out by the controlled opposition in a virtual world, simply because the latter is louder. However, organic opposition is far more ancient and stronger, as is based on relationships, and what is currently termed networking. You see, the controlled opposition is one-dimensional. It has only one point of control - e.g. Reuters.
For an example of how relationships are the difference: witness how fast FB community groups will rally around the 'right' thing, or how groups can have activists who are mocked openly, or that some arsehole starts doxxing, and then swiftly gets banned.
My point is, the pepes are standing up. As an example of organic resistance, my son recently stopped a bullying session on facebook (would you have?), after he found out that the lady who was being dogpiled (she was a contestant in a beauty pageant) did it for her family - and her father was dying from cancer, so her claim to fame meant a lot to them - pictures of her parents crying because she got into the finals. He flagged the posts which were literally saying that she was ugly (she was not, one of his retaliatory comments was: She is prettier than your wife) and got the ugly behaviour removed, and then he sent the girl a supportive message. Within minutes the ugliness was righted. It was a small step for man and a leap for mankind. Note that he is not a moderator or anything, just a member of the public. So you see, one can turn their censorship into a weapon to fight back. Just make a decent, moral case, and the fat comtollers can't disagree. If FB don't react properly, they will face consequences - just like Noblesse Oblige was a thing. And so, we circle back to the medieval Good/Evil paradigm.
There is a difference between "can't" and "haven't been able to yet." Your presumption is that I was speaking in "absolutes" (I appreciate a lack of nuance in my rhetoric). Anytime your scope is large enough (a few thousand years of effective total control e.g.), I suggest it is OK to use rhetoric that promotes that "all" because it's close enough to say "all" as makes no nevermind within the scope of the current understanding. Those beyond that understanding generally understand that that absolutism is a tool to impress how bad it really was for them (and is for most everyone else), and that tool is in fact useful, even if there are caveats not noted (which would distort the message).
If you investigate, you find that the entire world (not counting people truly disconnected to the Eurasiatic super continent (including a lot of India and norther Africa)) has been controlled through controlled opposition for at a minimum of 1700 years. (AT A MINIMUM). So when I say "all" or "can't" etc., what I mean is "What has actually happened, on a societal scale" not "what is possible," or "what happened for a couple people or small group who were then suppressed" (murdered or genocided).
Q (assuming they aren't themselves controlled opposition) is proof that it is possible, but if you realize what it took to get there, you would appreciate that it took a couple thousand years of concerted effort (working from the shadows of the shadows using tremendous resources, patience, intelligence, and a few tragic failures) to create a true Awakening (illuminating the shadows to all living in darkness).
I suggest it isn't really "organic" (free in the strictest sense), but rather organized and controlled in the strictest sense. The difference between the Cabal and Q is that their intentions are (I hope, and is supported by the evidence) in actual opposition; a true "other side." They may be working towards that goal (a social structure of truly free People), but to get there, they are far from free or organic. Rather, they must work towards the strictest box to effect their goals. And, since We are an essential part of The Plan, must We similarly be restricted (substantial elaboration below).
We too are "organic" but not really, because we too are working within an allowed box. It's a different box of the Cabal box, but it's still a box. NCSWIC is clearly a "box." Maybe it has a fuzzy boundary (to an extent) but it can't really because we are still controlled (as a society, not for an individual) by the sources of information; the allowed information. (The "memory hole" is a perfect example of a piece of the puzzle that is a true (in a societal scope) Black Hole of controlling information). ALL sources are STILL either created or allowed through the same mechanisms they always have been. The Movie is the same, the Director has changed.
This is similar to my previous discussion regarding my rhetoric of "absolutes." But there are really good reasons to believe it is effectively (and completely) true. It isn't that "Reuters" is controlled. It's that ALL "sides" are controlled. I did an exhaustive investigation. My investigation showed, beyond a reasonable doubt, that every single possible path of information was created and/or controlled (funds, board of director connections, shell company connections, explicitly stated intentions, etc.), and it still is. The mechanisms are complete, You are welcome to read my book if you wish. It gives a good start into how that was accomplished (the current version of it), but there is so much still left out (of what I've published so far) that allows for some "reasonable doubts." I assure you, if I do get out the rest, no reasonable doubt of my assertions can remain. EVERYTHING is controlled opposition.
That System still remains. Only the Director has changed, and there is some (intentionally allowed) fringing on the edges.
The more you dig, the more you find; ALL of those "examples" are themselves controlled. Even if they begin organically, they are slotted SPECIFICALLY to one of the allowed boxes. So the effect is controlled completely; i.e. inorganic.
This sounds ridiculous until you investigate who controls what; when all of the thousands of allowed boxes (all in "opposition") were created, and for what purpose. The Matrix is COMPLETE. You can't believe it until you see it. Then that's all you can see (you can finally see the Code).
This is not organic, this is slotted to an allowed box. The allowed boxes have been amplified or muted to direct a different society wide group belief system. All of those boxes can be found as "purposefully created" if you dig into the evidence deeply enough. Many of them come from the CIA or DOD exposures, but many come from the creation of boxes from the Church (starting from the very beginning) all the way through today. Look into the Reformation, the Enlightenment, Martin Luther and Jakob Fugger in the early 16th century. Look at how the information was completely controlled by Fugger to create both the "Reformation" and the Catholic Church, benefitting from "both sides."
It's all hidden. These statements look like they are "clearly the opposite of the truth." But the more you dig into the primary sources, the more you find. And it's been going on for forever.
It's a crazy world.
This is an example of "organic" ish, but it's meaningless (in a broader scope) until it becomes big enough. And if it becomes big enough, then it's slotted into one or the other "allowed slots" (depending on the desired spin from the Director, usually amplifying/muting one or two or more of the allowed boxes to create a "opposition" effect, all by design to create a "resolution" or "synthesis" (in the "dialectic" sense)). So, is that really "organic" or do you believe it is?
Again, UNTIL YOU DIG INTO IT, it sounds crazy. The world CAN'T be that way.
Until you find overwhelming (unassailable) evidence, and then it's all you can see.
Why do you think this is taking such a long time? It's certainly not "organic." It's still The Matrix. We just have a different Controller.
By design (and the reason I believe we do in fact have a different Director) the changes of the sizes and shifts of the boxes is to show People that They are the True Authority. That the "government" is a lie trying to exert false Authority over Our Jurisdiction.
That too can be shown to be not organic but a "New Matrix" design.
Indeed, when you look at it like that, Q is a psyop. One that has been going for thousands of years.
So on the civilizational level: we can't get through the day, without mentioning Rome.
I cannot deny that the Romans brought with them lifestyle and wealth. But their dark underbelly is described clearly in the Bible, in the very beginning of the New Testament. We are for example alerted to the barbaric practice of forcing people to go to the place of birth, to be counted in a census. And at the end of four chapters, we are reminded of the Roman execution practices.
Of course, Roman roads were built so strongly, that many of them are still in use. One has to admire that. They were built for tax-collection and military movement. It's just that people would use them too, for trading. And this created so much wealth that archeologists love 'Roman layers', for the enormous amount of junk. But, this also signals an industrial revolution and enormous wealth - a golden age..
Thus, the recognition that the Military and Civilians both benefit from an upgrade in infrastructure, or whatever.