Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

65
IDLE BOASTERS CAN'T RUN SANDWICH SHOP: Devon Eriksen critiques two groups seeking an extra trillion dollars for US government foreign policy or personal use and argues anyone claiming superior results must first operate a sandwich shop before gaining real power preferring innovation over even… (twitter.com) 🗣️ Thoughts Anons? 💬
posted 15 hours ago by catsfive 15 hours ago by catsfive +65 / -0
7 comments share
7 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (7)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– SuckaFree 4 points 14 hours ago +4 / -0

Devon Eriksen pretty much hit the nail square in that post. It wouldn't even necessarily have to be a sandwich shop. Just any type of business, really. Operating a business successfully is a lot harder than these asshats think it is. Keeping it in the black, while also expanding it and branching out into other industries is even harder. Musk chose some of the hardest industries to build a business in, too. If no THR HARDEST. Not just hard from a technical standpoint, but hard to make a profit with. And he expanded all of them too. 3 companies started from the ground up. One of which directly benefits humanity by giving the poorest among us the same access to information as the richest. And another that will benefit us by allowing us to explore and expand ourselves beyond this planet.

I don't think I s pretty fucking awesome what he's been able to accomplish so far. He dared to dream big, but more importantly, he acted on those dreams successfully. And he has other dreams he wants to chase, too.

Personally, I'm interested to see what else the man can accomplish with basically what amounts to unlimited funding. All these naysayers and haters are just talking shit because they're jealous they don't have 1/10000th of his wealth. They're the same type of people you read about that win a giant lottery jackpot but end up flat broke within 5 yrs after winning. If they truly cared about humanity and the planet, they'd already be doing more about it than spewing and spreadin hate and vitriol like a shit truck sprays manure on a farm.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BurnNewHistoryBooks 4 points 14 hours ago +4 / -0

The biggest detractors of the successful tend to be those that achieve virtually nothing.

The basic premise of Devon’s response is a great idea that should be mandatory for any public servant involved with spending our money.

A huge amount of OUR so called “debt” is due to the mentality of people who spend with no regard to where that money came from.

The vast majority of public servants have and will never create wealth. They therefore have no concept of earned value.

We hear weekly about insane spending by them in Ireland, an example being €150,000 spent on a 6x2 meter bike shed. A bike shed built with tax payers money, that they are not allowed to use. It’s reserved for public servants.

It needs to stop.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– catsfive [S] 3 points 15 hours ago +3 / -0

Devon Eriksen responds to a claim that a trillion-dollar fortune would prompt immediate fixes for global housing food healthcare and happiness. He identifies two common types of idle boasters. One group seeks the money for the US government to accelerate foreign interventions and domestic imports. The other group wants the funds personally without showing prior results from existing wealth. Eriksen proposes that anyone claiming superior management must first demonstrate success running a small sandwich shop before receiving broader authority. He notes that statements of doing better cost nothing and prove little. With resources like those held by Elon Musk Eriksen would prioritize investment in emerging technologies rather than redistribution of current assets because the former advances human capability while the latter merely reallocates existing conditions. He concludes that fixing suffering holds greater value than distributing it evenly.

SOURCE: https://x.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/2065533566973521966 SOURCE (mirror): https://xcancel.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/2065533566973521966

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BurnNewHistoryBooks 3 points 13 hours ago +3 / -0

Who is this John Bourscheid?

My degree is in accounting. I've never done a thing with it. But I took my incessant love of spreadsheets and used it as a springboard to a successful career in marketing.

So basically an employee who created nothing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– The_Watcher 2 points 12 hours ago +2 / -0

John Bourscheid: I really don’t understand true greed.

I think we can safely add envy and business to the list of things that Bourscheid does not understand! I am sure many believe that someone worth a lot of money has it all in a box under the bed.

In reality, that money will be mainly tied up in business and those businesses will be providing jobs for thousands and will already be improving their lives as a result.

In a way, I do sympathise with Karl Marx when he says the workers should own the means of production. Where we differ is that he seemed to think that meant that the business owners should just give it away or have it confiscated. My preferred approach would be to have anyone who wanted a share to either purchase it from the owner or create their own business.

This IPO gave workers the opportunity to do just that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SOGWAP 1 point 7 hours ago +1 / -0

What a trillion dollars solves...0.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SirBudLight 1 point 11 hours ago +1 / -0

Id have a competition. Who ever( group or individual )can come up with most perfect plan to use $1 Trillion dollars towards to betterment of Humanity, wins it. There are limitations on how much can be taken for Administrative Overhead. The more efficiently the funds are disbursed, the higher an extra bonus is paid. This will get people thinking of profound solutions.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 7 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy