I am so sick and tired of hearing this ridiculously stupid bullshit about how nobody has ever seen a virus, and viruses aren't really viruses, they're parasites. First of all, viruses have been imaged for decades, ever since electron microscopes have been around. And yes, I would know, since I have 32 years of working in virology labs. And no, they are not parasites.
You are making the absolutely stupid mistake of assuming that since the only thing Ivermectin is marketed for is to treat parasites, everything it successfully treats is therefore a parasite. That is childish logic, and about as stupid as it gets. Ivermectin is approved off label to treat arthritis, and I can personally vouch that it works since I have used it for my arthritis...does that mean arthritis is actually parasites rather than an inflammatory disease? No, it means that in addition to killing many parasites, Ivermectin also has very strong anti-inflammatory properties as well.
Ivermectin is incredibly effective against many types of cancer. It is part of my wife's cancer protocol that has saved her life and has her close to full remission. Does this mean that cancer is just a bunch of parasites? No, it does not! It means that in addition to its anti-parasitic effects, Ivermectin has several other modes of action, some of which act to combat many forms of cancer.
Some of these other modes of action allow Ivermectin to treat a small number of viruses, including COVID (SARS-CoV-2). This doesn't mean that viruses are really parasites, it means that Ivermectin has an amazing range of different modes of action, and one of them allows it to kill certain viruses. Stop thinking like a 5 year old and assuming that just because the box says "For treatment of parasites" that therefore everything on the planet that Ivermectin affects must be a parasite.
Thanks. It really is an illogical assumption that viruses are therefore parasites. People just parrot this "nobody's seen a virus" just like they parrot the "Hitler didn't kill any Jews and he was actually joking when he wrote the Final Solution" because... reasons. Anyway, how long has your wife been taking ivermectin? Did she cut out all carbs and sugars?
My wife is not taking much Ivermectin because it has been impossible to get our hands on affordable Ivermectin at cancer treatment levels in the USA. The last week or two, we have started to add 6 mg per day to her regimen (FAR LESS than the recommended 85-120 mg per day she should have to treat cancer) because a couple of friends/coworkers have been able to bring back a few pills for us from Mexico when they visit family there. But customs will only allow very small quantities to be brought into the country, so that's the best they can do.
Even in states that allow Ivermectin to be sold OTC, pharmacies are gouging the hell out of people, charging $2.50 or $3 per 3 or 6 mg tablet when those tablets only cost pennies to produce. Places like The Wellness Company are price gouging just as bad, if not worse. I found a holistic doctor who is willing to prescribe as much as we want, but my insurance will only cover 30 mg of pills every 90 days, and we cannot afford the out of pocket prices. We refuse to order pills directly from India because of the very common cases of contamination in drugs manufactured there and sold directly. I have a bottle of injectable Ivermectin stashed in a refrigerator for an emergency should she take a turn for the worse, but since it is designed for injections in animals, it contains additives to make the injections absorb better that can be toxic if taken orally. She's doing so well on our home protocol without Ivermectin however, that we haven't had to resort to taking that risk.
TrumpRX.com has ivermectin now, but only 3 mg pills for $1 each, still unaffordable at the levels recommended for cancer treatments. Hopefully they will add more Ivermectin options soon, and reduce prices to useful levels.
I am so sick and tired of hearing this ridiculously stupid bullshit about how nobody has ever seen a virus, and viruses aren't really viruses, they're parasites. First of all, viruses have been imaged for decades, ever since electron microscopes have been around. And yes, I would know, since I have 32 years of working in virology labs. And no, they are not parasites.
You are making the absolutely stupid mistake of assuming that since the only thing Ivermectin is marketed for is to treat parasites, everything it successfully treats is therefore a parasite. That is childish logic, and about as stupid as it gets. Ivermectin is approved off label to treat arthritis, and I can personally vouch that it works since I have used it for my arthritis...does that mean arthritis is actually parasites rather than an inflammatory disease? No, it means that in addition to killing many parasites, Ivermectin also has very strong anti-inflammatory properties as well.
Ivermectin is incredibly effective against many types of cancer. It is part of my wife's cancer protocol that has saved her life and has her close to full remission. Does this mean that cancer is just a bunch of parasites? No, it does not! It means that in addition to its anti-parasitic effects, Ivermectin has several other modes of action, some of which act to combat many forms of cancer.
Some of these other modes of action allow Ivermectin to treat a small number of viruses, including COVID (SARS-CoV-2). This doesn't mean that viruses are really parasites, it means that Ivermectin has an amazing range of different modes of action, and one of them allows it to kill certain viruses. Stop thinking like a 5 year old and assuming that just because the box says "For treatment of parasites" that therefore everything on the planet that Ivermectin affects must be a parasite.
Thanks. It really is an illogical assumption that viruses are therefore parasites. People just parrot this "nobody's seen a virus" just like they parrot the "Hitler didn't kill any Jews and he was actually joking when he wrote the Final Solution" because... reasons. Anyway, how long has your wife been taking ivermectin? Did she cut out all carbs and sugars?
My wife is not taking much Ivermectin because it has been impossible to get our hands on affordable Ivermectin at cancer treatment levels in the USA. The last week or two, we have started to add 6 mg per day to her regimen (FAR LESS than the recommended 85-120 mg per day she should have to treat cancer) because a couple of friends/coworkers have been able to bring back a few pills for us from Mexico when they visit family there. But customs will only allow very small quantities to be brought into the country, so that's the best they can do.
Even in states that allow Ivermectin to be sold OTC, pharmacies are gouging the hell out of people, charging $2.50 or $3 per 3 or 6 mg tablet when those tablets only cost pennies to produce. Places like The Wellness Company are price gouging just as bad, if not worse. I found a holistic doctor who is willing to prescribe as much as we want, but my insurance will only cover 30 mg of pills every 90 days, and we cannot afford the out of pocket prices. We refuse to order pills directly from India because of the very common cases of contamination in drugs manufactured there and sold directly. I have a bottle of injectable Ivermectin stashed in a refrigerator for an emergency should she take a turn for the worse, but since it is designed for injections in animals, it contains additives to make the injections absorb better that can be toxic if taken orally. She's doing so well on our home protocol without Ivermectin however, that we haven't had to resort to taking that risk.
TrumpRX.com has ivermectin now, but only 3 mg pills for $1 each, still unaffordable at the levels recommended for cancer treatments. Hopefully they will add more Ivermectin options soon, and reduce prices to useful levels.