No propaganda. Just read Solzhenitsyn and you will get a glimpse of the truth. There are other Soviet-era writers with the same or more miserable testimony.
It explains the stridency and psychological suffering in the music of Shostakovich. For decades, I was puzzled by his music, which was very accomplished, but unsettling to hear. And then I heard his 2nd piano concerto, whose middle movement was a meditation on peace and beauty. And then I became aware of his noted piece of music for "The Gadfly," a similar work of beauty and calm. And, in his symphonies I considered strident, I was able to realize that there were notes in the bridges that were absolutely perfect (I have a pretty good ear for music). And then it finally dawned on me after all these decades of listening to his music and not understanding it: He had the facility for writing Perfect Music. Which meant that he was expressing his emotional pain in the music that jarred the listener so much. He was like great painter...painting a scene of torture and misery. It was a miracle that Stalin was so obtuse and didn't understand---for if he had, he would have had Shostakovich shot. I am glad I persisted in listening to him. I shall hear him far differently now.
Read the autobiographies and historical studies. There is a reason why Russians are great writers. We like to categorize Russians as those who write "Russian novels." We miss the point. Russians are those who READ Russian novels. As a result, Russian science fiction is thematically different from Western science fiction. (Maybe it is a Slavic thing. The Polish science fiction writer Stanislaw Lem is even farther different.)
Heh. Well, I could dodge and say that the differences are the same as between western and Russian fiction generally, but that would be no help for you. I would say that the Russian science fiction tends to pose moral questions. Not simply moral dilemmas, but how to think about unprecedented circumstances. What is important is not so much the action but which path the main character takes. This is pretty much in keeping with Russian literature generally. It shows up strongly in Fyodor Dostoyevsky (e.g., "Crime and Punishment", and "The Brothers Karamazov").
There is a wonderful novel by Mikhail Bulgakov, "The Master and Margarita", in which Satan comes to Earth and raises havoc. A side story of the divine disorder is a meeting between Christ and Pontius Pilate, in which they are reconciled. I can't describe how wistful I felt about that reconciliation.
In another novel, by Vladimir Savchenko, "Self Discovery", he recounts the history of a biological researcher who devises a way to make perfect clones. So he tries it on himself, not without peril, because the process involves him being more or less dissolved so his template can be captured. He is reconstituted along with his copy. The clones are greatly confused by this state of affairs, but he nurtures them to knowledge, producing about half a dozen or so. The household becomes more uncomfortable for everyone, due to the confusion over personality, so the clones all decide to depart and go their separate ways as individuals, which they do. The experimenter is sad to see them go, but he understands the necessity for a person to be a person, not a mimeograph copy. In time, he undertakes a final experiment, but the process fails and he is gone. Afterward, not knowing this, the clones mutually decide to have a reunion and they return...to find their template forever gone. This is a blow and they ponder together how ought they to live, now that he is gone, in honor of his memory. Sometimes, what you do next is not entirely free of attachments and obligations. You have to keep in mind in the reading, that the theme applies to the experimenter as well as his clones.
Anyway, there are others of a similar spirit. I don't know if this is a helpful answer. If you enjoy science fiction broadly, I think you will find much in Russian SF. I would be hard pressed to find American counterparts, but Ursula LeGuin's novel, "The Dispossessed", comes closest. It is the story of a moral temptation to a man who retains his integrity. Possibly also, Ray Bradbury, though I am not thoroughly acquainted with his work.
It depends on which composer and one's taste. There is a reason that Tchaikovsky is so popular, as he is very accessible to western musical tastes (give his "Cappricio Italien" a chance). Rimsky-Korsakov is associated with many interpretations of stories (e.g., Scheherezade). I am a great fan of Rachmaninoff, whose music has some of the most surpassing beauty I've ever heard (he composes very lyrically). Prokofiev is very lively and is known for composing famous film music (e.g., "Aleksandr Nevsky"). Somebody once said, "There is always enough music for time, but never enough time for music."
You have a good insight regarding major and minor keys, but I am enough of a musical illiterate to not know the difference. Maybe it comes from living in near-arctic conditions (their taste in keys, not my musical ignorance).
The jewish communist plan was to take over Russia.
They tried in 1905 and failed.
They tried again in 1917, and succeded in a very violent way, murdering tens of millions of White Russians.
Interestingly, jews funded the Russia-Japan War of 1904, using it as a cover while the Tsar was distracted to attempt the take over of Russia.
They then funded WW1 in Europe, again getting the Tsar distracted with war in Europe, so the could try the takeover again.
The next step was to move westward into Europe to spread the jewish communism, targeting Poland and then Germany.
THIS is why Hitler and the German people had to fight.
Ultimately, they were able to infiltrate most of Europe with their communist filth, though ironically, Putin more or less ended it in Russia.
Ex-German soldiers explaining to a young Dutch woman why they had to fight, and why her uncles "disappeared" from the Netherlands when the Germans came in (because her uncles were partisans against the Germans -- not an ureasonable position to take for the Dutch, but the Dutch government was secretely helping the English in a suprise German invasion, which is why Hitler went in to beat them to the punch) --
Bizarre irony to think that Eastern Europe needs an Iron Curtain to keep out the Communist West. I truly never saw this coming.
Going to have put up the Iron Curtain to keep Russia free! Bizarre irony for sure!
Right?
It makes me wonder if the East was ever really the Communist side at all, or if its just propaganda...
No propaganda. Just read Solzhenitsyn and you will get a glimpse of the truth. There are other Soviet-era writers with the same or more miserable testimony.
It explains the stridency and psychological suffering in the music of Shostakovich. For decades, I was puzzled by his music, which was very accomplished, but unsettling to hear. And then I heard his 2nd piano concerto, whose middle movement was a meditation on peace and beauty. And then I became aware of his noted piece of music for "The Gadfly," a similar work of beauty and calm. And, in his symphonies I considered strident, I was able to realize that there were notes in the bridges that were absolutely perfect (I have a pretty good ear for music). And then it finally dawned on me after all these decades of listening to his music and not understanding it: He had the facility for writing Perfect Music. Which meant that he was expressing his emotional pain in the music that jarred the listener so much. He was like great painter...painting a scene of torture and misery. It was a miracle that Stalin was so obtuse and didn't understand---for if he had, he would have had Shostakovich shot. I am glad I persisted in listening to him. I shall hear him far differently now.
Read the autobiographies and historical studies. There is a reason why Russians are great writers. We like to categorize Russians as those who write "Russian novels." We miss the point. Russians are those who READ Russian novels. As a result, Russian science fiction is thematically different from Western science fiction. (Maybe it is a Slavic thing. The Polish science fiction writer Stanislaw Lem is even farther different.)
Could you elaborate on the differences between sci-fi written by Russians and other authors?
Heh. Well, I could dodge and say that the differences are the same as between western and Russian fiction generally, but that would be no help for you. I would say that the Russian science fiction tends to pose moral questions. Not simply moral dilemmas, but how to think about unprecedented circumstances. What is important is not so much the action but which path the main character takes. This is pretty much in keeping with Russian literature generally. It shows up strongly in Fyodor Dostoyevsky (e.g., "Crime and Punishment", and "The Brothers Karamazov").
There is a wonderful novel by Mikhail Bulgakov, "The Master and Margarita", in which Satan comes to Earth and raises havoc. A side story of the divine disorder is a meeting between Christ and Pontius Pilate, in which they are reconciled. I can't describe how wistful I felt about that reconciliation.
In another novel, by Vladimir Savchenko, "Self Discovery", he recounts the history of a biological researcher who devises a way to make perfect clones. So he tries it on himself, not without peril, because the process involves him being more or less dissolved so his template can be captured. He is reconstituted along with his copy. The clones are greatly confused by this state of affairs, but he nurtures them to knowledge, producing about half a dozen or so. The household becomes more uncomfortable for everyone, due to the confusion over personality, so the clones all decide to depart and go their separate ways as individuals, which they do. The experimenter is sad to see them go, but he understands the necessity for a person to be a person, not a mimeograph copy. In time, he undertakes a final experiment, but the process fails and he is gone. Afterward, not knowing this, the clones mutually decide to have a reunion and they return...to find their template forever gone. This is a blow and they ponder together how ought they to live, now that he is gone, in honor of his memory. Sometimes, what you do next is not entirely free of attachments and obligations. You have to keep in mind in the reading, that the theme applies to the experimenter as well as his clones.
Anyway, there are others of a similar spirit. I don't know if this is a helpful answer. If you enjoy science fiction broadly, I think you will find much in Russian SF. I would be hard pressed to find American counterparts, but Ursula LeGuin's novel, "The Dispossessed", comes closest. It is the story of a moral temptation to a man who retains his integrity. Possibly also, Ray Bradbury, though I am not thoroughly acquainted with his work.
Your comment made me think of Russian music I have heard, and it is often somber.
I wondered if the composers wrote a lot of it in minor keys rather than major keys.
A quick search, and sure enough, mostly minor keys.
It depends on which composer and one's taste. There is a reason that Tchaikovsky is so popular, as he is very accessible to western musical tastes (give his "Cappricio Italien" a chance). Rimsky-Korsakov is associated with many interpretations of stories (e.g., Scheherezade). I am a great fan of Rachmaninoff, whose music has some of the most surpassing beauty I've ever heard (he composes very lyrically). Prokofiev is very lively and is known for composing famous film music (e.g., "Aleksandr Nevsky"). Somebody once said, "There is always enough music for time, but never enough time for music."
You have a good insight regarding major and minor keys, but I am enough of a musical illiterate to not know the difference. Maybe it comes from living in near-arctic conditions (their taste in keys, not my musical ignorance).
In the last 80 years they were not the boogeyman and likely never were
My thoughts exactly. The term USSR derives from the UKRAINIAN Soviet Socialist Republic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Soviet_Socialist_Republic, not Russia. The clue is in the name, really.
The government chose them to be the boogeyman for all things we did bad
Irony.
The jewish communist plan was to take over Russia.
They tried in 1905 and failed.
They tried again in 1917, and succeded in a very violent way, murdering tens of millions of White Russians.
Interestingly, jews funded the Russia-Japan War of 1904, using it as a cover while the Tsar was distracted to attempt the take over of Russia.
They then funded WW1 in Europe, again getting the Tsar distracted with war in Europe, so the could try the takeover again.
The next step was to move westward into Europe to spread the jewish communism, targeting Poland and then Germany.
THIS is why Hitler and the German people had to fight.
Ultimately, they were able to infiltrate most of Europe with their communist filth, though ironically, Putin more or less ended it in Russia.
Ex-German soldiers explaining to a young Dutch woman why they had to fight, and why her uncles "disappeared" from the Netherlands when the Germans came in (because her uncles were partisans against the Germans -- not an ureasonable position to take for the Dutch, but the Dutch government was secretely helping the English in a suprise German invasion, which is why Hitler went in to beat them to the punch) --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJkNZ30WV0
Also, Stalin's secret plan to enter and take over Europe: "How Hitler Saved Western Europe From Stalin" --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OM1UlLkQQfZv/
Except that the Nazi movement was controlled opposition, and was clandestinely controlled by Jewish and Bolshevik interests, I agree
LOL, what’s the story with Italy here?
Predicting that communist bitch Meloni?
Maybe. It’s weird that Italy is even on othe wall since they were allies with the Austrian Taxidermist, but why does it look like a roadkill skunk?
I mean, what other animal would you choose to represent Italy?