The movie is about a foreigner (an American) who owns thousands of properties in Europe. He acts entitled because of it. He doesn't like that there are older people in their 50s and 60s working for his company so he tells a manager to get rid of them and bring in new blood. He is in his 40s but he's not married and he doesn't have children. He has sex with prostitutes. And he kills European citizens.
He killed law enforcement officers for doing their jobs. He killed innocent people in a car (men? women? children?)simply because they didn't change lanes.
There were some cool moments and some good points made but it was really badly done.
Not to mention the gaping holes in the plot. He asks a woman in the hospital if she wants justice and she says "Yes" and that's the end of it. The movie never shows the vigilante going after her assailant. Then there are three teenagers in a park assaulting an innocent guy. Two guys and a girl. The vigilante breaks the two guy's bones but the girl magically disappears.
I understand the point it was trying to make and I agree with that point, but it was so terribly executed.
There were a few unnecessary scenes, but I think they were trying portray that he is just an ordinary human with ordinary vices - could have done a better job.
He gave them all a fair warning. Its funny that swat teams dont get sent out to protect people from gang rapers and random slashers, but to the guy who takes them out. Didnt have any problem with that.
This was the only complaint I had. This was totally unnecessary considering the judge was drugged up and didnt really appreciate the point.
Gotta say, the scene in the park with the two guys was very satisfying, but he should have had the girl have it at least a bit as well.
The best part was the way he handled the gang rapists and the family that actively enabled that behaviour.
Could have been better, but it wasn't too bad overall.