I haven't watched the content yet. But the snip you posted has me calling BS. I say that because this is how we should have known him for all this time if all the information detailed in your snip is true. I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
This isn't the story any of us grew up with. Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
I say that because this is how we should have known him
Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
Because that is the response of every single person who claimed that 'if all those baseless conspiracy theories were true, we'd know it.'
Are you convinced that COVID was a verifiable pandemic, that people should have been wearing masks, that all the lockdowns were unfortunate but necessary measures, etc? And that the covid virus thing actually came from bats in a wet market?
Because until the truth emerges, that's what people believe.
Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
Well, obviously. But the argument that "if this was true, I'd know it" is a completely false logic.
What do you understand about the world that you did not understand 10 years ago? Anything? or nothing?
I think its fine to be skeptical, and calling something out as BS is a natural response to information that contradicts something we think we know, but I strongly encourage you to watch or listen to the content before passing judgment. But only if its something that interests you, or you are willing to question what you know.
For me, all this was new information, but listening to the content, well, this certainly got me thinking.
I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
"Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
I'm asserting there is a body of information that has endured for decades and not a single iota of the informatuon brought forward has ever been heard of until this moment. Sus
This is why the timing is suspicious.
This isn't information waiting to be discovered that was available at ANY time in the past. Sources? Emprical evidence? Just my thoughts on it.
I'm not invested enough to dig any deeper. But I'm not compelled to change my mind either.
I haven't watched the content yet. But the snip you posted has me calling BS. I say that because this is how we should have known him for all this time if all the information detailed in your snip is true. I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
This isn't the story any of us grew up with. Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
Because that is the response of every single person who claimed that 'if all those baseless conspiracy theories were true, we'd know it.'
Are you convinced that COVID was a verifiable pandemic, that people should have been wearing masks, that all the lockdowns were unfortunate but necessary measures, etc? And that the covid virus thing actually came from bats in a wet market?
Because until the truth emerges, that's what people believe.
Well, obviously. But the argument that "if this was true, I'd know it" is a completely false logic.
What do you understand about the world that you did not understand 10 years ago? Anything? or nothing?
I think its fine to be skeptical, and calling something out as BS is a natural response to information that contradicts something we think we know, but I strongly encourage you to watch or listen to the content before passing judgment. But only if its something that interests you, or you are willing to question what you know.
For me, all this was new information, but listening to the content, well, this certainly got me thinking.
Um, because some one bothered to look?
"Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
I'm asserting there is a body of information that has endured for decades and not a single iota of the informatuon brought forward has ever been heard of until this moment. Sus
This is why the timing is suspicious.
This isn't information waiting to be discovered that was available at ANY time in the past. Sources? Emprical evidence? Just my thoughts on it.
I'm not invested enough to dig any deeper. But I'm not compelled to change my mind either.