I would imagine that the US would not permit this technology to be shared unless we have something so new, and so profoundly devastating as a weapon that the AMRAAM system is now childishly outdated and obsolete.
The USA has pulsed energy weapons that can destroy incoming missiles faster than they can be launched. You thought those energy farms were for AI centers? Think again.
I would imagine that the US would not permit this technology to be shared unless we have something so new, and so profoundly devastating as a weapon that the AMRAAM system is now childishly outdated and obsolete.
BINGO...you win the internet for the DAY...that is EXACTLY CORRECT!!!!!!
AMRAANs have been around for about 30 yrs...sooooo, these other "countries" are getting OL' Technology while the F-35 gets the NEW ones!!!!!!
Also, I do believe that the F-35 and missiles are either "tethered" to the pilot or can be released without guidance by pilot!!!!!! That is all!!!!!
The USA has pulsed energy weapons that can destroy incoming missiles faster than they can be launched. You thought those energy farms were for AI centers? Think again.
'I'm giving you all she's got Jim , I don't think she can take much more.' Again.
You will know when destroyers start being outfitted with sub power plants.
A proper license is like free money. And if history is any indication, we have something better in the pipeline.
This is a terrible decision. The EU is a parasite.
Let it feed on our old shit.
Better idea: give it to US citizens.
Have faith , we have bigger fish to fry.
Faith in what?
Yourself is a good start. Future ranks a strong second. I could go on but...
AMRAAM is like 30 to 40 years old right? So this would kind of be the equivalent of us giving WWI tanks and planes to our WWII allies....
https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/events/transcripts/2026/07/07/remarks-by-nato-secretary-general-mark-rutte-on-transatlantic-defence-industrial-cooperation-in-action-at-the-nato-summit-defence-industry-forum