It is a strange take, I agree. I have seen sports leagues registered as "entertainment" categories. I have seen conspiracies that are no longer just theories. Corruption is rampant and being exposed now. Liberal thinking is self-immolation, FIFA is global, hosted by America in liberal Seattle (last night), Belgium is part of DS EUROPE, TRUMP is at NATO today and humiliating America is on the table. Yes, strange now seems new normal 😂.
I too believe it is scripted. So "just good pressure defense" is only a surface defense. But the script never explains itself, it just happens in the background. What I mean is that on the surface, none of the players really care about the politics when the game is in play.
Scripting a game only requires active script adherence from a few strategic individuals - the majority of the players are sincere. When they get too close to learning how things are arranged behind the scenes they get cycled out if they don't want to play along. So I'm just saying that in this game, the sincere players on the US side got rolled over and humbled by better controlled play. If the story comes out that politics played with the US team's morale, I'll be surprised.
Great analysis u/Mr_A ! Agree that "it" only takes a few key players to make a situation happen. Who knows? I was watching a strange lack of engagement, someone else said our team was timid and I agree with timid. But...why timid? When is 'lackluster' or 'timid' intentional? In sports, that suggestion is taboo.
It is a strange take, I agree. I have seen sports leagues registered as "entertainment" categories. I have seen conspiracies that are no longer just theories. Corruption is rampant and being exposed now. Liberal thinking is self-immolation, FIFA is global, hosted by America in liberal Seattle (last night), Belgium is part of DS EUROPE, TRUMP is at NATO today and humiliating America is on the table. Yes, strange now seems new normal 😂.
I too believe it is scripted. So "just good pressure defense" is only a surface defense. But the script never explains itself, it just happens in the background. What I mean is that on the surface, none of the players really care about the politics when the game is in play.
Scripting a game only requires active script adherence from a few strategic individuals - the majority of the players are sincere. When they get too close to learning how things are arranged behind the scenes they get cycled out if they don't want to play along. So I'm just saying that in this game, the sincere players on the US side got rolled over and humbled by better controlled play. If the story comes out that politics played with the US team's morale, I'll be surprised.
Great analysis u/Mr_A ! Agree that "it" only takes a few key players to make a situation happen. Who knows? I was watching a strange lack of engagement, someone else said our team was timid and I agree with timid. But...why timid? When is 'lackluster' or 'timid' intentional? In sports, that suggestion is taboo.