No democrat would ever win without women votes. Meanwhile, no republican would ever win without male votes. Not to mention, the ideals that allowed these corrupt fucks to be "elected" were mainly promoted and allowed because of feelings.
I understand your sentiment, but please put the feelings away and objectively examine it. Remove feelings from it. In a logic only environment, none of those listed would have ever been elected.
No Democrat would ever win without the black vote either. However, I don't see you advocating for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and voting rights acts.
I am not saying the blacks should have their vote removed. I am just pointing out the selectivity of the "barefoot and pregnant" crowd when they want to find excuses to remove the rights of people they wish to control.
It really has nothing to do with electing Democrats at all. If it did, you' d be advocating removing voting rights from both groups.
Oh and by the way, not all women vote Democratic. There are divisions by, age, race, and affiliation. But of course you already know that and don't really care.
And I am viewing a misogynistic viewpoint completely objectively.
The comment was about sex, not race and stated by a woman on the supreme court now.
"In actual presidential elections, the gap is often more pronounced. For example, in the 2020 election, exit polling via the Cornell Roper Center indicated that 57% of women voted for the Democratic candidate (Joe Biden) compared to only 42% of men. Conversely, women also historically turn out to vote at higher rates than men in every presidential election"
It is not misogynistic to observed the statistics and make an accurate statement based off the same statistics.
Again, this is an emotional response based on the topic at hand.
Of course there are other variables and similar statements can be made in the inverse or about different categories, but the one that was discussed here is in fact accurate. If you feel accurate statements are misogynistic then I hate to break it to you but it is an emotional response. I am not advocating for the repeal but when the topic comes up, it is usually by other women. Social media is not the greatest by any means but when this topic is discussed, it is usually a woman saying for it to happen and the men being the ones saying no.
You've sidestepped the issue. Why aren't you calling for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and the voting rights act when the majority of blacks vote Democratic?
If your gripe is truly about groups that primarily vote Democratic and a call to repeal the ammendment which gave them voting rights then you should be advocating for the repeal of both ammendments.
But you're not. You're only advocating taking away the rights of ONE of the groups. Why is that?
I'm talking about what you advocated for on this forum. You're responsible for your own statements. So I want you to explain the double standard you're using.
I am using a perfectly logical argument that is not at all emotional. The only possible reason for you to take that position is misogyny. The large amount of women who vote for Democrats is no more destructive to our society than the large amount of blacks who vote for Democrats. Yet you only advocate for removing the rights of women.
It's a perfectly logical and non emotional argument. Just because you call it "emotional" doesn't make it so.
Again since reading is apparently hard for you. The issue was gender, not race. YOU made it about race. Again like previously stated, I am NOT advocating for it, YOU are implying I am. All I did was point out statistics and advise a truthful statement. YOU are the one side stepping the topic at hand. YOU are the one implying race was the original topic at hand. AGAIN I am NOT advocating for the repeal. YOU jumped to that. Are YOU replying to ALL the others in this thread with the SAME reply that RACE is the topic and not GENDER?
You are proving YET AGAIN that you are being emotional and stating I am advocating for repealing of rights when I have NOT done that in any way. YOU are the one pushing that.
For the FOURTH TIME, I am NOT advocating for the repeal of ANY rights. STOP stating I am. Interesting that you jumped right to black people when pointing out the majority of women vote democrat. By your logic, you are racist then right? Since referring to ANYTHING is automatically against it right?
It is NOT logical to say untrue statements. I have NOT advocated for the removal of rights. Yet you say you are being logical when you state I have?
Perhaps one should have to pass a critical thinking test before being allowed to vote. If someone lacks the ability to exercise logic, they get removed from the voting rolls.
I wonder how many people would be left to vote, then. Most women would be removed. Almost all inner city blacks would be removed. Trailer parkers would almost certainly be removed. Hell, three-fourths of present college graduates would be removed, too, since their "gender studies" bullshit degrees don't teach them how to reason at all.
No democrat would ever win without women votes. Meanwhile, no republican would ever win without male votes. Not to mention, the ideals that allowed these corrupt fucks to be "elected" were mainly promoted and allowed because of feelings.
I understand your sentiment, but please put the feelings away and objectively examine it. Remove feelings from it. In a logic only environment, none of those listed would have ever been elected.
No Democrat would ever win without the black vote either. However, I don't see you advocating for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and voting rights acts.
I am not saying the blacks should have their vote removed. I am just pointing out the selectivity of the "barefoot and pregnant" crowd when they want to find excuses to remove the rights of people they wish to control.
It really has nothing to do with electing Democrats at all. If it did, you' d be advocating removing voting rights from both groups.
Oh and by the way, not all women vote Democratic. There are divisions by, age, race, and affiliation. But of course you already know that and don't really care.
And I am viewing a misogynistic viewpoint completely objectively.
The comment was about sex, not race and stated by a woman on the supreme court now.
"In actual presidential elections, the gap is often more pronounced. For example, in the 2020 election, exit polling via the Cornell Roper Center indicated that 57% of women voted for the Democratic candidate (Joe Biden) compared to only 42% of men. Conversely, women also historically turn out to vote at higher rates than men in every presidential election"
It is not misogynistic to observed the statistics and make an accurate statement based off the same statistics.
Again, this is an emotional response based on the topic at hand.
Of course there are other variables and similar statements can be made in the inverse or about different categories, but the one that was discussed here is in fact accurate. If you feel accurate statements are misogynistic then I hate to break it to you but it is an emotional response. I am not advocating for the repeal but when the topic comes up, it is usually by other women. Social media is not the greatest by any means but when this topic is discussed, it is usually a woman saying for it to happen and the men being the ones saying no.
You've sidestepped the issue. Why aren't you calling for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and the voting rights act when the majority of blacks vote Democratic?
If your gripe is truly about groups that primarily vote Democratic and a call to repeal the ammendment which gave them voting rights then you should be advocating for the repeal of both ammendments.
But you're not. You're only advocating taking away the rights of ONE of the groups. Why is that?
I'm talking about what you advocated for on this forum. You're responsible for your own statements. So I want you to explain the double standard you're using.
I am using a perfectly logical argument that is not at all emotional. The only possible reason for you to take that position is misogyny. The large amount of women who vote for Democrats is no more destructive to our society than the large amount of blacks who vote for Democrats. Yet you only advocate for removing the rights of women.
It's a perfectly logical and non emotional argument. Just because you call it "emotional" doesn't make it so.
Again since reading is apparently hard for you. The issue was gender, not race. YOU made it about race. Again like previously stated, I am NOT advocating for it, YOU are implying I am. All I did was point out statistics and advise a truthful statement. YOU are the one side stepping the topic at hand. YOU are the one implying race was the original topic at hand. AGAIN I am NOT advocating for the repeal. YOU jumped to that. Are YOU replying to ALL the others in this thread with the SAME reply that RACE is the topic and not GENDER?
You are proving YET AGAIN that you are being emotional and stating I am advocating for repealing of rights when I have NOT done that in any way. YOU are the one pushing that.
For the FOURTH TIME, I am NOT advocating for the repeal of ANY rights. STOP stating I am. Interesting that you jumped right to black people when pointing out the majority of women vote democrat. By your logic, you are racist then right? Since referring to ANYTHING is automatically against it right?
It is NOT logical to say untrue statements. I have NOT advocated for the removal of rights. Yet you say you are being logical when you state I have?
Perhaps one should have to pass a critical thinking test before being allowed to vote. If someone lacks the ability to exercise logic, they get removed from the voting rolls.
I wonder how many people would be left to vote, then. Most women would be removed. Almost all inner city blacks would be removed. Trailer parkers would almost certainly be removed. Hell, three-fourths of present college graduates would be removed, too, since their "gender studies" bullshit degrees don't teach them how to reason at all.