Hey, MSM? We are the news, now.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
I disagree it's that simple because Q wants to strike a careful balance with not scaring away the normies while also encouraging people to dive deep and research the ugly and politically incorrect truth.
This is the same balance that you're trying to maintain with GAW, however the moment you censor the truth, you create an obstacle to people learning the truth... and you become part of the problem.
Don't misunderstand me, I'm not planning to spam your forum with antisemitism or chase away the normies, however claims can be both antisemitic AND true... and the Jewish Problem will organically be part of many discussions because western civilization is being attacked from all sides and from within, by Jews: in our Jew controlled Democrat Party and our Jew controlled mainstream media and our Jew controlled refugee relocation foundations and our Jew controlled Central Bank and our Jew controlled online forums too.
Let's look at some Q posts that lead us directly to naming the (((enemy))):
Q sent us to Voat - the most antisemitic platform so we too could become red-pilled about the Jew;
Q identified the (((enemy))) in post 3778 when he named the "Big 5" most powerful Democrat leaders;
President Trump (Q+) and Q repeatedly claim the mainstream media are the enemy of the people. Jews own our mainstream media and Jews control our mainstream media. Q has made this claim 16 times;
Q posted this image in post 998.
Q and President Trump made their hatred of our Jew owned MSM in their Fake News Award "winners";
Q posts 940 compares Antifa's flag to the German Jewish Communist Party flag of 1933 - to redpill us about the original Antifaschistische Aktion domestic terrorist group of 1930 which was created by the Jewish German Communist Party (KPD). Q wants us to research the holocaust hoax and the Jew's declaration of holy war against the German people in 1933 and (((their))) attempt to enslave the German people with a failed coup against the legitimate Christian based government. Q wants us to understand our mainstream history books are as fake as our mainstream news networks.
Q post 1489 identified the enemy as Israel (FEAR IS REAL ~ "Fear Israel")
Q has identified Jews as the major players, including red-pilling us all about how many central banks the Jew owns (Q post 135 - 138);
Q post 1489 claimed that Israel has made several assassination attempts against President Trump;
Q will be "Saving Israel for last" - most likely because Israel the headquarters of the globalist's white genocide machine. It seems likely that Q's focus on Epstein's blatant links to Mossad may ultimately draw the entire world's focus on Israel's network child rape extortion honeypot which they use to turn politicians into life-long puppets of Israel.
Q tells us to "follow the bloodlines"... which has uncovered some interesting research about the House of Saud and the House of Windsor in relation to the 13 Tribes.
Q draws our attention to the orgy island synagogue and asks about the design and color (i.e. it's the Israeli flag / Jew prayer shawl);
Q+ has repeatedly expressed his respect for General Patton - a patriot who expressed hatred for the Jew.
I'm delighted for anyone, including mods, to rebut any antisemitic claim, however it's important to understand that claims can be both antisemitic and true. This community can't be both a research forum for the battle of ideas AND a politically correct safe space... and if we're forbidden from naming the enemy, then I believe this forum will become part of the problem that Q is attempting to solve. This movement is referred to as the Great Awakening, not the Partial Awakening.
Not all red pills are easy to swallow.
(I posted this earlier, but I hit reply on the wrong comment)
You certainly make very valid points, and Im absolutely receptive to your message. I've spent a significant amount of time on Voat myself, so what you're saying isn't new to me. I'm also very very glad that you're willing to have a dialog around this.
You are obviously very very knowledgeable and passionate about the topic, and at the moment it's pretty much just you here. But we know from the experience of voat, that there are plenty of people who agree with you and if we don't draw the line somewhere, then all we have is 2 voats instead of voat and GAW.
This is a critical time for our movement, and we're expecting a large influx of new and curious people from all nations, races and creeds. We need to win hearts and minds, as you know deradicalisation is a long process. in the past I'd linked to voat for quite a few people, and several people saw all the "anti-semetic" posts and just completely noped out. I'd love for this place to be the honey that traps more flies than vinegar.
How about a gentlemanly compromise? You continue to provide the excellent research you have done and be hassled as little as possible by us, but you try to find opportunities where the subject has already been brought up organically by other users? At least in this early growth stage, say the next couple of weeks and then we can revisit? As the userbase matures, there will probably be more and more people who will be receptive to your message. (As an example, although you did link it to be the post we are commenting on, it wasn't really connected to the spirit of the meme, I'm sure you'll concede.)
You are very welcome here, but let's work together to achieve our goals.
What you propose sounds reasonable because it's your platform to run however you want. You owe me nothing and it's my choice to contribute to your platform or not.
That said, we're on the front line and at the end of the line in a fight to save America and western civilization and our children from becoming the disposable slaves of the (ahem) "globalists" ... and it's not always easy to remain silent, especially after a glass of wine.
Unless you update your side-bar rules to include terms like "politically correct", "racism" or "safe space", it'll be frustrating and difficult for red-pilled people to know where your amorphous boundaries are.
I've been permanently banned four times from TDW, always for discussing Epstein's blatant links to Mossad, within Ghislaine Maxwell related posts. I appealed the ban each time and finally spoke to Doggos, who confirmed it was the same mod who was getting triggered by any criticism of Israel. (Every. Fucking. Time.)
I wonder if Jesus judges those who protect pedophiles to be no better than the child rapist?
Rather than having GAW mods behave like that TDW mod, who uses the ban-hammer to crucify heretics, can I recommend PM'ing the individual and asking them to pull-back a bit... and then temporarily banning them for a few days if they don't comply?
Hey, Im so glad we were able to meet in the middle and understand each other - thats why were here right?
I'm with you about needing clear rules, and youre well aware of how shitty moderation has impacted our research and the broader Trump movement. Ive been on Reddit since 2007 and Ive seen that place absolutely nose-dive.
The intention is 100% to make this site like a bridge between the wild west of voat and the chans, and the absolutley sanitized Facebook. Youll always get pushback from someone who doesnt want to mention Jews, but Im sure youre used to that. Like I said, if its organic and done in a way that is meant to educate rather than demonize, I dont see how thats unreasonable at all. I mean, facts are facts right?
If you ever have any issues with moderation that you think goes against what we've been discussing, please message me directly. I'm more than happy to see what I can do to resolve. And Im the night janitor (because Im in Australia), so I have less to moderate anyway.
Anyway our non-cucked football in Australia is about to start, hooroo.
Hey, I'm also a mod here, and, mind if I NOT "weigh in," but share a very minor comment?
All this is really good info. You lift, you research, I'll be direct, us mods want to make sure people that lift and research feel welcome, here. But you have to know when to "hold 'em," when to keep your powder dry. Sometimes our deepest researchers are months and months ahead of where today's Q narrative actually is. We lift, our Q mods spend as much time researching to stay current as we do modding. We're no mere gatekeepers. But we also have a "sense" of where the narrative is. ALL I'm saying is that sometimes if one of your deeper posts gets removed or doesn't get the traction you think it deserves, just please know, we're not trying to censor your hard work. It's also important that the RIGHT information (which you may indeed have) comes out and quickly becomes prominent at the right time. What's the right time? It's when your audience has caught up to you, when the upvoters are finally seeing what you saw months ago, and when that happens, you can bet that the mod team 'stickies' your post and gives it the attention it deserves.
We are on your side, but sometimes, the mod team has to make the final call. TRUST that we are here to DESTROY the deep state and support our hardest-core researchers and diggers who have the info we need, when that info is "breaking" in the overall collective Q consciousness.
I hope this makes sense. Hoping we can have a constructive dialog going FWD in this sub.
Have you considered that "where today's Q narrative actually is", is defined by the Overton Window and how willing we are to have open and robust discussions about prickly topics such as the Jewish Problem... that has plagued humanity for 3,500 years?
Have you considered that Q is smart enough to direct his movement without you trying to shape the narrative by censoring valid research?
When Q chooses by directing our research by dropping posts... is the only right answer to your question. No outside comms.
The truth doesn't need your rules to protect it.