I'm not technical enough to get into the IP discussion. I've read several takes on it and it's still somewhat foggy to me.
Otoh, the pens are something I can understand. Jim Watkins is an enthusiastic pen aficionado. It's somewhat of a coincidence that Q has posted many pics of expensive pens. [Trump uses a custom Sharpie.]
Ok I took the time to read the article and it states the same conclusion:
The short answer is it doesn’t prove Jim Watkins is Q, despite people shouting that online all week.
The "Watkins is Q" line is the latest shill attempt to discredit Q and that seems to be all it is.
The actual argument seems to be that Watkins could post as Q if he wanted to, which could be true, but then Q team would know about the fake posts pretty quickly so it's not much of an argument.
I'm not technical enough to get into the IP discussion. I've read several takes on it and it's still somewhat foggy to me.
Otoh, the pens are something I can understand. Jim Watkins is an enthusiastic pen aficionado. It's somewhat of a coincidence that Q has posted many pics of expensive pens. [Trump uses a custom Sharpie.]
Ok I took the time to read the article and it states the same conclusion:
The "Watkins is Q" line is the latest shill attempt to discredit Q and that seems to be all it is.
The actual argument seems to be that Watkins could post as Q if he wanted to, which could be true, but then Q team would know about the fake posts pretty quickly so it's not much of an argument.
Pens also don't prove anything.
Prove anything? No.
Coincidence? Yes.