Bruno Barking Has Idea about [P] in Q #714
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Eh each to their own. If you wanna follow the pure autism stream-of-consciousness stuff from folks like serialbrain2, then enjoy yourself and have fun.
I wont be because its indecipherable. Why expend time on this stuff when there are so many more stories and events transpiring that have more relevance and associations with public figures, places and records?
I like PM but others seem not to as much - the thing about Q is the emphasis on thinking for yourself, and of a necessity a large enough group of people will be diverged enough to have a wider intake of interests and preferences in regard to analysing drops than a smaller.
After this came out, the amount of Payseur evidence flooded all over. But, people still question because as of yet, could [P] be considered defined?
Its not a topic area I've known anything about until just the last couple days - perhaps its just me but I suspect there are more anons for which this is also new info.
A bit of searching has lead to the below link which references [P] quite heavily - again all new to me, but if I had to make a call, I think you are right in that we have some substantive connections as to what P signifies.
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/08/16/p-the-unseen-masters-of-all-qanon-greatawakening-whoisp-illuminati-13bloodlines-payseur-springmeier/
I'm not a fan anymore of this anon. I used to be. So whenever he bumps into me, I usually troll him. I don't go out and look to get into it with him, but will defend myself when he gets picky nasty as this is his character. So, I'll pass on that, thank you.