You should also watch The Hunt for Red October entirely. The characters don't gloat. They analyze, decide, execute, perform. Efficiently and proficiently. And with style, like Scott Glenn's Capt Mancuso that Q likes so much. It's a million light years away from 4chan-style culture. Guess which one is more likeable for normal folks.
Interestingly, I don't recall reading anything that predicted anything to do with Hunter Biden as an impending October BOOM. This is one data point that shows we should take predictions with a pinch of salt. Has anyone checked how accurate predictions are? I think there are a lot of misses.
I think we should have posts with a bit more maturity. Phrases like "low-info idiot" and "kids" are not going to endear us to the more general audience.
I don't think there is any need to gloat. We have all been wrong loads of time. Take Rudy for instance. Many of us thought he was past it, then this happened. There is no need for gloating, chest-beating, or words like 'idiot' and 'faggot'.
Did Flynn tell us to gloat? Nope, he told us to explain. There are plenty of good people still trapped in the thrall of mainsteam media. These are not bad people. Many of us were exactly like them, not long ago.
Reach out and explain with maturity. Lead by example, please.
Actually, nobody I read pointed that out and linked it explicitly to Hunter Biden before the story broke. Well, obviously Q is in on it. But outside observers did not explicitly find it. So to be less ambiguous, I was discussing those outside observers who make predictions based on what they see or interpret in Q postings. You know, those with date predictions, that huge clock thing, etc. Did you read about anybody's prediction (outside of Q) before the story broke?
This ?. What Libs said. October has been around for a long while if you were looking. February 7, 2018 I believe was The first mention of red October, and many many times since
Thank you. Please read my reply to LibsAreCrazy. I did not realize the first para was ambiguous. I was really discussing those who make predictions based on Q posts, not Q posts themselves. The second ambiguous thing was that people misunderstood I am somehow implying that the October booms were not predicted. My bad for not writing clearly.
I was really trying to point out that nobody specifically predicted Hunter Biden for October, from reading Q posts. Did you read anyone predicting it? I only check the more mainstream sites, no FB or Twitter.
You should also watch The Hunt for Red October entirely. The characters don't gloat. They analyze, decide, execute, perform. Efficiently and proficiently. And with style, like Scott Glenn's Capt Mancuso that Q likes so much. It's a million light years away from 4chan-style culture. Guess which one is more likeable for normal folks.
Interestingly, I don't recall reading anything that predicted anything to do with Hunter Biden as an impending October BOOM. This is one data point that shows we should take predictions with a pinch of salt. Has anyone checked how accurate predictions are? I think there are a lot of misses.
I think we should have posts with a bit more maturity. Phrases like "low-info idiot" and "kids" are not going to endear us to the more general audience.
I don't think there is any need to gloat. We have all been wrong loads of time. Take Rudy for instance. Many of us thought he was past it, then this happened. There is no need for gloating, chest-beating, or words like 'idiot' and 'faggot'.
Did Flynn tell us to gloat? Nope, he told us to explain. There are plenty of good people still trapped in the thrall of mainsteam media. These are not bad people. Many of us were exactly like them, not long ago.
Reach out and explain with maturity. Lead by example, please.
Actually, nobody I read pointed that out and linked it explicitly to Hunter Biden before the story broke. Well, obviously Q is in on it. But outside observers did not explicitly find it. So to be less ambiguous, I was discussing those outside observers who make predictions based on what they see or interpret in Q postings. You know, those with date predictions, that huge clock thing, etc. Did you read about anybody's prediction (outside of Q) before the story broke?
This ?. What Libs said. October has been around for a long while if you were looking. February 7, 2018 I believe was The first mention of red October, and many many times since
Thank you. Please read my reply to LibsAreCrazy. I did not realize the first para was ambiguous. I was really discussing those who make predictions based on Q posts, not Q posts themselves. The second ambiguous thing was that people misunderstood I am somehow implying that the October booms were not predicted. My bad for not writing clearly.
I was really trying to point out that nobody specifically predicted Hunter Biden for October, from reading Q posts. Did you read anyone predicting it? I only check the more mainstream sites, no FB or Twitter.
Please post this if you haven't already? It's worth a sticky. LMK