490
15
Here's a Crazy idea. ?️ DISCUSSION ?
posted ago by 2820928 ago by 2820928

Edit: PM from an anon: This is a good idea. I was perma banned from the community and reread the rules and still dont know which one I broke nor has anyone responded to me.

How about the community focused on toppling the pyramid stops resembling it?

Despite the (often vague and not helpful) logs, there is little-to-no transparency - there is no clear punishment for any of the 20-something rules which most of us have accidently broken at one point or another, anyway.

What if the mods abdicated their golden, anonymous, Q-shaped thrones and just - you know... moderated? Not rule with an iron-fist? Not censor accounts? I see a shill and I Think Ban! Deport! Refute! - why? - most of them are unwittingly doing so, and merely brainwashed sheep - my fellow man. A victim to the lies of the cabal.

I've been one of the more active anons going after shills, but now I'm thinking it was all a waste of time and energy - who cares?... What effect have they had? If anything the shills red-pill me more, what about you? Do they spread doomitus or it is just engaging negatively which causes you annoyance?

We can self-moderate with our votes - post our comments and posts with good research, well thought-out points, links, etc. (if we want to be credible). If we're too busy, low-info posters, shills or whatever - then we can post without evidence, claims, etc. and just be doomed to the bottom-half of the comments until we wise up.

Let the shills talk and see how accepting we are, how much we love them and hate the cabal - the cabal which we will record the fall of, and display for all to see - shills included. We're on the side of the good guys, Jesus, the Heavenly Father, the humanitarians, buddha - whatever.

We're all in this (against the Satanic pieces of shit) - together, whether we know it or not. How about we leave shills be, and just ignore them.

Let the people decide who to listen to: let the people decide who's a retard, who's a doomer, who's a shill - I mean, isn't that what Q is all about? Critical Thinking? Deciding for yourself? I think many GAW have grown complacent, trusting that all evil-dooers and naysayers must already have been banned, and that many of them have become sheep-like in the same way 2021 FB users are sheep-like..

Hell let the shills have a platform, let them comment - they'll all be down-voted to oblivion anyway. Might be we'll have to introduce verification at login to keep their activity down, might not. I just reckon most of the hot page will be the cream of the crop either way - and I'm tired of all this unnecessary conflict.

MikeWho isn't a shill, he's just some guy who thinks GN is the shit (despite all evidence to the contrary) Kek. Doesn't need to be banned for it - in my view every visibly active mod has made mistakes (especially catsfive, he is not a good mod IMO), well if they stop banning there won't likely be a half as many, and our community might flourish like never before.

The mods can reduce their hours substantially, and help us research and join the discourse, again - many of them are great Qoomers and Autists whose talents are being wasted currently.

You can always back-up the accounts as is and restore all the registered accounts back to right now, and restore the current rules if it doesn't work.

Edit: I've thought about this some more and there have been some preliminary discussions - this is looking less and less like a "Crazy" idea (I actually Capitalized the C to be sarcastic btw) and more like a better way of running things - with free speech and democratic 'bans'.

If you don't like someone, no need to run to mommy and 'deport' them - just ignore their comment/pm/post or whatever and move-on. Or reply with love and/or facts and research to debate with them.

If they're clearly here to sow discord, you can always just block them! No need for mommy-evspra, or mommy-cats five or daddy-NottenOnEtt. Just ignore, respond with love or block - not necessarily in that order, give people as many chances as you want - or as little as you want. We all have free will.

Simple as that! Good arguments will rise to the top, and you don't have to read the bottom ones, just move on to the next post.

29
273
463

There are so much labels like "anti-vaccer", "libtard", "homophobic", "commie", "bigot", "transphobic", "Islamophobic", etc. that the cabal uses to divide (and conquer) us so that we never have a proper discourse - so that we get dumbed down into emotional arguments and squabbles instead of getting educated on topics (and opinions), and learning about how the world works.

They don't want us to debate or talk to each other - they want us to fight each other so that we don't fight them.

358
Homosexuality actually is a choice, by the way. (Former homo here). (media.patriots.win) ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
posted ago by 2820928 ago by 2820928
131
1, 2, 3, 4 - I declare a meme war. (media.greatawakening.win) WWG1WGA
posted ago by 2820928 ago by 2820928
368
97

My knowledge on this is lacking, so I'll just lurk but - discuss in the comments?

Obviously anyone you know is named Larry or Sarah and you barely know them.

58
70
42

Reply:

Reminder: Q made >100 mistakes (it's probably like 15, but we'll go with 100 to be safe) on 4953 drops... in other words - Q made mistakes during 0.02% of Q drops.

I will look for mistakes, suss comments and inconsistencies on these specifically-selected pro-George screengrabs, and we'll come up with a mistake percentage for these sample comments from the GeorgeNews Telegram account.

1st link: Punctuation knowledge is that of a foreigner, English as second language?

2nd: No visible errors.

3rd: SuperLame MS paint chart.

4th: "from all the way down there in mommy's basement."

Using overly grandiose and capitalized words - stating all the ways they're fantastic for not solicitating direct donations. what are they trying to prove?, why childish language?

5th: "It's a catch 22 really, if we don't, someone else will, and we don't want people to think they are buying something that is not officially linked to us. "'who is GEORGE NEWS'"

Neither of these statements seem to make grammatical sense.

6th: "In a nut shell, we are Patriots. We have been 'online' for a long time. Both by the name you know us by now, and another. We are also credentialed for WH, State, and DoD. Yes, we are known to WH Admin (current and very much the great team 45 one) We have been invited to many secure 45 events, both locally and internationally and are also known to the WH Travel Office. Basically, we are here for the long haul. We are NOT planning on going anywhere."

English as a second language?, definitely more virtue/insider-signalling by GN, why would they be 'known' to 'current WH Admin' if Q+ insiders?, and where is the evidence for their exclusive coverage of the Trump events? "and very much the great team 45 one?" KEK.

7/8th: "4. ANY type of message relating to a free "DJT 45" COIN.. there are no official coins available. And lastly, if in doubt, ALL our links are at linktr .ee/georgenews and our two store links are: "GEORGENEWS .SHOP" georgenews .shop for home and GEORGENEWS .redbubble.com for office. They are both, our NEW and Official partners. Have a GREAT day! G MAN OUT!"

SHOPS are incorrect, why would a whitehat op need outside funding?, looking to sell crap, emphasis on capitalized - suss. Just checked GEORGENEWS .redbubble - at least some of they're merch comes from a Californian company with manufacturing in asia, as expected. Patriots? Riggght.

9th: Notice of a supposed Trump placeholder webpage - seems like more Authority/Insider-signalling from GN - no word from Trump or anyone else this is even a legit website.

10th: "So to say again; We don't have a 'GEORGE' PayPal. CashApp, venmo etc, we don't use ANY crypto.. We are NOT on Teespring anymore. We will never ever be on GOFUNDME either. We are self funded but YOU having our site and name on your chest helps MORE than you realize. Note the link georgenews .shop Now redirects to our new partner."

Self funded but need Patriot money?. Lies - and also appears like virtue signalling, and why finished with Teespinrg? I think all these new partners is to keep up with Patriots getting tricked into buying this chicom sweatshop crap.

I don't know who the heck Liz Crokin is, but her telegram bio is: "Banned from Twitter since 2018. Pizzagate is real. WWG1WGA" which sounds like the fakest, most obvious controlled op bio I've ever read - and the "within minutes of each other" posts she posted between Scavino and George News had a 22 minute difference. I wouldn't be surprised if this chick had 90% bot followers on Twitter and Telegram just so she could "independently" give credence to George News or some shit Lol.

I'll give them a very generous 90% mistake/suss rating (this is even post-GN edits btw). Much prefer Q's 0.02%, myself - what about the rest of you Qtards?

NO OUTSIDE COMMS.

360

This is not a normie site. The purpose of GAW is not to engage in long, drawn-out emotional exchanges in the comments - we're not Facebook.

We're glad to have you onboard, none of this would not be possible without you, those who joined before you - and it certainly won't be possible unless billions join after you. The Great Awakening can be both amazing and horrifying, hilarious and stress-inducing - but one thing it will never be is boring.

You should know there are a lot of shill accounts hiding amongst you, and that the more professional and based you guys are - the easier it is to tell you and them apart.

The rules to prevent your posts, comments, etc. from being deleted are on the sidebar, and if you haven't read them - you should go do that now.

In addition to following the rules, here is some friendly advice to really get you Qooming like an effective digital soldier:

(1): Research topics before making claims or denying facts.

(2): Opinions are welcome, but controversial ones are trusted more when backed-up by things like Q-incidences, research, facts, hyperlinks, and Q drops.

(3): Try not to deny the accepted facts too vehemently, and make sure any claims or arguments against are backed up with evidence.

(4): If you've compiled some research and believe it's worth sharing - either make a post about it, or share it in the comments of a relevant post.

(5): If your post is a duplicate, seems to have missed the mark, or is breaking the rules or bordering on it - consider deleting it. The mods have a lot of work to do, and we can help them improve the quality of GAW by self-moderating.

(6): Remember that we're making history here - we should all feel privileged to be a part of it.

(7): There is no single day where literally everything is revealed - that would make many go insane. The awakening is happening gradually, and we are currently in the beginning stages of the "March madness" phase. Enjoy the show.

39
107
No more controlled opposition for me, thanks. (media.greatawakening.win) ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
posted ago by 2820928 ago by 2820928
336
47
228
117
182

Remember when it was common sense that you can't cure the flu? - It was talked about as this unobtainable future ("Maybe we'll even have a cure for the common cold").

The truth is that viruses have been around since forever, are absolutely tiny, (need airtight seal to prevent transmission) and are on the whole good for us.

It can convincingly be argued that viruses are symbiotic - without viruses our immune systems would be much weaker, and more susceptible to all sorts of illnesses, diseases and infections.

Then [they] invented "vaccines", which honestly I doubt ever worked at this point. The amount of high-level information they outright faked is so atrocious I'll want independent and uncontrolled scientists (not influenced by money or ideology) to re-verify even the fundamentals of "vaccines".

My friend who is very based and has been right about dozens of whacko, crazy things (this is years ago) from election fraud to DNA manipulation, NWO, banking, drug dealing, DS/cabal, RINOs, blood types, etc. etc. said "vaccines" have always been tools of depopulation and DNA manipulation - that they make people infertile, increase birth defects, rate of miscarriages, etc.

139
115
376
514
57
Shillhunting 101 ? These people are stupid!
posted ago by 2820928 ago by 2820928

The Noob Shill

Hasn't even got their first paycheck from George Soros yet, spends first few days on the job with obvious posts which get them banned in 7-17 minutes.

Sample work: "NOTHING HAPPEN, HUH?", "HA -Qtardds!", "Err, but Trump lied about x, and CNN said y."

The "I'm new here" Shill

They've cashed their first paycheck and are trying really hard to earn their bonus, has learnt how to make their shill-symbolic (shillbolic?) name passable to most users, posts stay up until a shill hunter comes along - or stay up, heavily-downvoted.

Sample work: "Hey Folks, just wondering how come Q said to trust sessions when all the patriots at TDW said he's no-good?", "Commie Fag!" (projection), "Well, that doesn't seem true, here's a link showing this other - unrelated topic proves another unrelated topic." "Fuck You, Retard.", "You're a dumb idiot if you believe that", "Haahha you're in a cult", "TRANSHUNTER!", "When I see someone so wrong as you, I must "call them out" on it."

The "4 week account/Deep plant" Shill

They're really invested in StOppInG MiSiNfoRmAtIoN, have spent 20-50 hours by week 3 arguing with borderline (and at times outright) leftist terminology and talking points, and will go on for a week or so until getting caught - we all see them as a Retard, if not a Shill.

Sample Work: "I'm more of a Q guy than an anti-vaccine guy", "I don't know - it doesn't seem like anything's going to happen", "what do I do now, Q failed me :(", "I got my first shot a week ago, feeling fine, happy to answer any questions about it., "Hollywood actors are disappearing?", "That looks like the real HRC lol - possible you're seeing differently because you want it to be a fake?", "Michele is not a man, this is the type of thing that the News uses against us", "(I'm more of a Q guy, not an anti-vaccine guy, just for the record -- not sure how much of a pariah that makes me, but there it is)".

In all seriousness though, don't allow yourself to be convinced by someone with only controversial comments, comments going against a clear statement from Q, supporter of libtard beliefs, low, low upvotes (0-500) and 40 day history (just to lose handshake), an account which only has comments placing doubt and disinfo (no contribution), an account with a name like "LeftLaneMustTurnLeft", "Krome891", "SurroundedInBlue".

When you engage with them and get back replies indicating they feel the need (job description) to fight MiSinForMatIoN, and starts going off with their MSM links, Wikipedia articles, etc... Regardless of if they're one of the (15-50k?) digital shills, they're not helping us. Not supporting Q and Great Awakening... Just rely on your own research, and to a limited-extent trust reputable anons in good faith (community). There are a lot of shills, but many of us - the good apples outnumber the bad by a LOT.

view more: Next ›