The variant should provoke symptoms faster than the Delta-4, and respiratory stress happen fast at the onset.

No word on how the models were designed. No word on how they know there will even be a "deadly" variant, and how it will even act if it doesn't even exist right now.

I'm flabbergasted.

The only silver-lining I can see from this prediction, is that if it's deadlier and faster to show symptoms, then it will be easier to contain and accelerate the end of the scamdemic, as the big problem of the 'rona is the relative silence allowing "asymptomatic spread".

Just trying to think critically. What is the theory that could link the Qposts about "WATCH(ing) the water" from 3 years ago to something that's so complicated and hard to predict reliably as weather events past a couple days today?

Weather predictions are made on simulations based on "the current weather" and "past years weather data", introducing a bias making it less likely to predict such a storm of catastrophic events.