1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not realistically. As long as big tech is cheaper, more efficient, accessible & “reliable”, it’s hard to get anyone to ‘regress’ back to basics.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +2 / -1

Her nose is visibly a different shape. The girl with Obama has an upturned, bulby nose and it’s a little wider. The girl bound has a smaller, but flatter nose and no bulb shape at the tip.

2
BluntProse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Super slippery slope, with each step making you more like them and less like us. We don’t dox people.

2
BluntProse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please don’t act like a damn Dem. Wtf is wrong with you? We don’t do that.

19
BluntProse 19 points ago +19 / -0

Why does he keep giving Fox the platform. Why not call in RSBN or OANN?

Give them the traffic and attention. They’ve supported you more than Fox has, especially when it came to the election!

2
BluntProse 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole point was that there are other methods, again birth certificate, DNA test, blood test - even a combination of all (if you are concerned with infallibility) COMPLETELY RID THE NEED OF LOOKING AT CHILDRENS GENITALIA.

It is not anyone’s choice to abuse/molest children, besides the sick pedo who does it. We should not be giving them any vulnerability or any accessibility to our children’s genitalia. Yes pedos exist virtually everywhere, but that doesn’t mean give them more opportunity or platform. Enough doctors and coaches ALREADY abuse and molest children. We do not need a “panel” with no liability (further in article) to do the same.

3
BluntProse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Definitely! Awareness is the first step, next step is to work on a plan of action!

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t care if the bill claimed their intent was to bring back Jesus - there is no reason to examine children’s genitalia. Doctors only check the genitalia of a minor - IF AND ONLY IF - it is medically necessary (ex. UTI). There is no excuse to check a child’s genitalia, when you can confirm gender via DNA test or blood test - which is infallible.

This is not to even mention the current pedo-conducive environment we are in. Where we hear about doctors and coaches manipulating and abusing children. There is just no valid reason to examine a child’s genitalia.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

I felt sick to my stomach. We already seen doctors and coaches abuse and molest children unsupervised. I can’t even imagine, and pray this NEVER becomes a reality.

4
BluntProse 4 points ago +4 / -0

This! Maybe even blood test, DNA test, birth certificate AND medical records - if someone’s worried they may be able to cheat one of the process...

But to look/“examine” children’s genitalia? There’s not a reason under God’s son.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because unlike you - I intend to stop every facet of pedophilia. I said before the source is shit and clearly now, you are just acting out on emotion and trying to throw whatever sticks. But if you want to carry on facetiously - be my guest.

But to let you get in my way of stopping and bringing attention to this? Not a fat chance in hell... And if it bothers you that much, I can block you to help.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

It references any participant, not just “trans” students. But maybe I’m wrong, the vagueness of this bill is not something I can say with 100% certainty. But regardless, there’s just no excuse to look at children’s genitalia, male or female. There are DNA tests, birth certificates, medical records - a plethora of means to identify gender, with out examining a child’s genitalia. Did you also see where there is no civil or disciplinary liability for this “panel”?

It also includes a provision granting protections for any “ordinarily reasonably prudent” actions by the physicians involved: “no physician acting in a voluntary capacity shall be liable for civil damages or subject to disciplinary action under professional licensing regulations as a result of the activities authorized or required by this Code section….”

2
BluntProse 2 points ago +2 / -0

It references any participant, not specifically “trans” students. But regardless, there’s just no excuse to look at children’s genitalia, male or female. There are DNA tests, birth certificates, medical records - a plethora of means to identify gender, with out examining a child’s genitalia. Did you also see where there is no civil or disciplinary liability for this “panel”?

It also includes a provision granting protections for any “ordinarily reasonably prudent” actions by the physicians involved: “no physician acting in a voluntary capacity shall be liable for civil damages or subject to disciplinary action under professional licensing regulations as a result of the activities authorized or required by this Code section….”

2
BluntProse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I swear the Lord’s Prayer always grounds me. Thank you fren!

3
BluntProse 3 points ago +3 / -0

“I just think it's entirely unnecessary when a non invasive lab test is available.”>

THIS! (Not to beat a dead horse lol)

2
BluntProse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just want it to stop, I want people to see the truth - and if that can’t happen, I pray that God returns sooner. Much much sooner.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now talk about taking someone’s words out of context. So you’re a hypocrite too?

2
BluntProse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just turned 19 when I had my first gyno appointment (had my period at 15). Even then it was uncomfortable - I was anxious and scared (never had someone look down there before). If my mom wasn’t with me in the office, I probably wouldn’t have gone through with it, even as a then-adult.

I could only imagine how horrifying and traumatic it could be on a little girl, in school (of all places), with no Mom or sister to be there for her. My mother also was VERY aware of how some doctors like to abuse their medical knowledge, take advantage of the power and title they have, and abuse little children. Coaches too. Doctors themselves don’t even examine the genital area of a child unless it is MEDICALLY NECESSARY. Playing a sport is not a medical necessity. And there are VAST ways to confirm someone’s gender: DNA test, birth certificate, medical records, etc. The fact that this was all overlooked and they jumped the gun straight to “examining child’s genitalia” (to me) screams alternate agenda. Alternate pedophilic agenda!

4
BluntProse 4 points ago +4 / -0

THANK YOU! I’ve finally come across the same. Help me brother!!

A hormone test, a birth certificate, and medical records - hell require all three.

But to “examine” little children’s genitalia, for a ‘sport’. Not to mention all the horrific things we already hear about doctors and coaches doing to children. Over my dead body.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crystal, as long as you defend pedophilic agendas and prerogatives, I will never want to be a part of any community you belong to.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you can’t answer my questions, why in the hell would I answer yours?

There is no excuse to look at a child’s genitalia, especially when there are other methods to confirm. The fact that you are only trying to deflect from this, is all the more telling.

1
BluntProse 1 point ago +1 / -0

DOCTORS ARE NOT PEDO-PROOF YOU IDIOT. The two are non-exclusive! THERE IS NO REASON TO LOOK AT A CHILDS GENITALIA - especially when you have other methods to not expose and traumatize a child! Wtf.

Even in the instance the DOCTORS NOTE ISNT LEGIT, I’d rather have a Janine that wants to be Jake playing on the basketball team - then have ONE OR ANY CHILD RAPED/ABUSED because we gave our child’s vulnerability in the hands of “a panel” in this sick, unnecessary bill.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›