It's sad there is so much vitriol and anger in the words you choose, which is very antiChrist. Perhaps you should read the Bible more and see what Jesus said about behavior like yours instead of listening to your inner ego:
Matthew 15:18-20 is a good start: But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man. For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies.These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man.
If you truly knew Christ and had the Holy Spirit in you, your words would be less egocentric and more gentle and compassionate. But, they're not so here we are.
You remind me of u/TheQStrategy, u/Zeitreise, and u/Quelle ;)
I understand where you are coming from. However:
Here's a tidbit from St. John of Kronstadt
I hope you'll find joy where you didn't before.
Brother, you're denying reality. I don't know what to tell you. If you think me pointing out obvious reality is trolling, I don't know what to tell you. Racism is hate speech. Hate speech is free speech. Censoring free speech is un-American. There's nothing you can say that changed that. You can try to word-salad around facts all you want. Facts never change. Feelings do, as you've demonstrated. As I originally stated, I don't have to agree with hate speech to defend it.
Here's another fact: Most people aren't aware of their own cognitive dissonance.
Have a blessed day.
I do not subscribe to the concept "hate speech". I consider it an invalid concept from the get-go
You should have learned by now that facts don't care about your feelings.
The question wasn't directed towards you, nor does the intent behind it have anything to do with anything mentioned by you.
Now that you're here, don't take this negatively: have you tried caring less about money?
I get farm-fresh, free-range eggs for $3/dozen.
Thanks, but no thanks, Finland.
Don't take this negatively: have you tried caring less about money?
Looking at the thread in question, in no place did the OP mod use the term or concept of 'hate speech', so you are kind of ignoring the original post and distorting it into something it isn't.
The whole premise of the post was racism along with biggoted and racist generalizations. Racism is hate speech. Though I appreciate you taking the time to comment, your inability to grasp that concept and why my response applied to it makes it hard for me to take anything else from your input seriously. I do appreciate you taking the time though.
I got a 1-day ban in this thread for posting the following comment, which was apparently deleted:
The 1st Amendment of the Constitution protects hate speech as free speech. Any excuse to censor speech that someone doesn't like is un-American. I get that this is a private board that can make its own rules however, if you're going to sell America First, you need to live it, regardless of how uncomfortable it may make you.
I do not have to agree with hate speech to defend it.
The ban comment included:
24 hour vacation to contemplate and gain an understanding of the fact that you do not have total unfiltered free speech on The Great Awakening.
and
Follow our lead, or find somewhere else to voice your unfiltered opinions.
Thoughts?
I wasn't trying to educate you on something new. I was demonstrating how it isn't really that complex and could be summarized in a single sentence, contrary to your claim.
I hope that clears things up for you.
Willful ignorance at its finest. Sad. Bigly.
I like how you are defending the Biden Administration's Department of Justice and showing how you're not afraid to lick the boot when it caters to your personal biases.
I was demonstrating how your cherry-picking doesn't track logically. If you believe one thing to be true based solely on accusations, you have to believe everything else based solely on accusations. But you don't, which was the point of demonstrating that and how flawed your reasoning is. I'm not surprised such a simple concept went right over your head, being ground-level and all.
If you read what I typed in more than one place, you'll see how off-base and demonstratively false your last inference is. At least you're consistent with being wrong and off-base. Maybe one day you'll stop letting your emotions get in the way of reason.
The Mayan calendar ending in 2012 marked the conclusion of a 5,125-year-long cycle (the Mesoamerican Long Count), symbolizing the end of an era and the beginning of a new one, not a literal doomsday.
The existence of SEAL Team 6 was not known to the public until the 1980s. Based on your logic, it didn't exist before then. That's absurd logic.
President Trump had dozens of indictments against him. Based on your logic, he is 100% guilty and not to be trusted.
Aside from Bill's claims, if he indeed raped a child, he's a scumbag that deserves far worse punishment than he's received. But again, what he may or may not have done in his personal life has nothing at all to do with what he's claimed in his professional life.
He's also questioned the official 9/11 narrative and stated there's no way a plane struck the Pentagon or went down in that field in PA. He alluded to the possibility Tomahawk missiles were involved. Based on your logic and reasoning, he is wrong about that too and should not be trusted.
I reject your poor logic and accept the possibility that he could be genuine about his claims all the while it still being possible that he's done heinous things. But, that's because I look at things from 40,000ft, not down on the ground with you.
Looks like someone is too cowardly to answer simple questions because it will highlight their inconsistent thought patterns molded by their own confirmation biases. Oh well.
I'm not covering anything. If it's true, it's disgusting.
But none of that disproves anything he claims. That's the point you all are missing.
I have watched and listened to what he had to say. He's never admitted to anything regarding pedophilia. He did say he had consensual sex with a 16 year old when he was 25 which, at the time, was legal in the state where it happened. That's literally not pedophilia. Do you even know what pedophilia actually is? .. because most people that use the word or allude to it are using it in regards to people in their mid and late teens. Words matter, people. Open a dictionary once in a while.
Elite research would show you refuting his actual claims, not attacking his character. Do you have any elite research material that refute the actual claims he's made instead of "don't trust him because he may have done some bad things?" He has a plausible explanation in the interview. Whether it's true or not comes down to he said/she said.
Let me ask you this: Why are there SEAL Teams 1-10 but 9 was conveniently left out from the public? SEAL Team 6 used to not exist until it existed, being revealed to the public in the 1980s. Did it not exist until the public knew it existed?
For someone trying to pass themselves off as a better researcher than others, you sure do lack actual research to substantiate the attitude. Hopefully, you have more than what little you brought here.
Cowboy up. Refute his actual claims. Ad hominems and non sequiturs are for the intellectually dishonest to use.
Original uncut interview:
Though all sin was atoned for by Christ dying on the cross, all sin is not forgiven by the act. We must still confess our sin and repent. Anyone that thinks all sin is forgiven and it doesn't matter how we live or what we do as long as we claim to be Christians, is sorely mistaken and clearly doesn't read the Bible.
I'm glad to know my joke brought about such awareness.
She's clearly an "Apaystle."
Basically, an apaystle is a revered yet slightly sketchy figure who spreads the doctrine of always having to pay for something, no matter how small.
Example: "The Apaystle of Fine Print hath declared: 'Verily I say unto thee, the free trial shall renew automatically, and thou shalt pay henceforth and forevermore.'"
https://www.kswo.com/2025/02/17/oklahoma-bill-seeks-make-ivermectin-an-over-counter-drug/
Most recently, SB 426 has been referred to the Senate Health and Human Services Committee for further consideration.
My unnecessary comment was unnecessary but I did it anyway.
Maybe I will, maybe I won't.
I'll need a tl;dr of a 15 minute video with no context. Thanks.