1
Brannvesen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The numbers don't add up either, the entire US military budget is "just" $840B, to "give away" $125B of that to a country that only has 1/70 the population and 1/30 the size for seemingly no reason makes absolutely no sense, not even Biden or Obama is that stupid. The shills knows this of course and tries to exploit people who just woke up or view the content on a phone were it's hard to notice such details. Every day is a new peak in clown world.

4
Brannvesen 4 points ago +4 / -0

what does that entail?

It removes liability, enough Americans carry guns to take out the government over corrupt deals, but make the claim that the money went to "Finland" or "Ukraine" and most Americans aren't gonna go there looking for it, because they can't even find these countries on a map.

Shills probably hired by your own corrupt local government re-post this lie for the 109th time to stop you from noticing the corruption. Always the same blurry screenshot and fake news media articles.

2
Brannvesen 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's a blurry screenshot re-posted for the 109th time, so it must be true. 🤡

Of course he didn't approve this, nobody did because it's fake and gay.

2
Brannvesen 2 points ago +3 / -1

At least a washing machine doesn't post blurry screenshots at 3am in the morning. This $125B number is being re-posted weekly by the same shill. As Germanys propaganda minister once said, if you repeat a lie enough times, it becomes true. Or so the shills may think.

6
Brannvesen 6 points ago +6 / -0

The only "sham" is that when they did the survey again after the Finns learned they are the happiest people in the world, they weren't as happy anymore because now they started to think about it and that made them wonder why they are happy.

You're right, if you don't know how much worse you're life could have been, the minor obstacles will cause the biggest problems in your life, while someone who lives a rough life is gonna appreciate the small positive things.

It's the same with "do you fee safe", ask that to someone in south Chicago and they might think for a wef seconds, then go something like "well, I didn't get shot today, so I feel very safe now". Meanwhile, ask the same question to a person in a small town that has never had any crime in its century long history, except for yesterday when a burglary happened and that person is gonna go full doomer, claiming that their safe town is the most dangerous place on earth, full of crime etc.

1
Brannvesen 1 point ago +1 / -0

After funding a proxy war against Russia, that won't happen. This is about making America dependent on Russian oil and gas. Putin knows that the average American is dumb enough to fall for it. Especially now when Canada will no longer supply the US.

2
Brannvesen 2 points ago +2 / -0

And for once they would have a valid reason to be concerned. It's never a good thing to be dependent on another country. Look at Germany, they are still recovering from their energy crisis.

5
Brannvesen 5 points ago +5 / -0

There aren't even flags or accurate uniforms. Only thing that may be real is background stock photos, but the equipment is wrong too. Sweden makes it's own guns and army vehicles so you wouldn't see any foreign made trash if it was real.

3
Brannvesen 3 points ago +3 / -0

We live in an era of AI and fake internet points so who knows. Maybe not overthink it, assume it's fake and gay until proven otherwise.

4
Brannvesen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct, they count locally and each district only process a few hundred votes. all of which can be traced through anonymous ID's. To commit fraud would require tens of thousands of people. And not just a single person in a district, all 8 or so people who count in tat district must be compromised and paid to shut up, because they all look at the same vote when counting one by one.

It's a distributed system designed to be fast and accurate. Practically impossible to cheat through manipulation.

4
Brannvesen 4 points ago +4 / -0

All I know is that some counter made a "joke" few years ago, "hehe, let's throw these nationalist votes in the rubbish eh?" She's in prison now, just for making that joke.

They don't let people count alone like in the US, there's usually 8 people at least, all looking at the same vote, they're checking each others while counting one by one. Meanwhile the room is full of observers, foreign as well as domestic, as well as members of the public who want to watch.

Now this might sound slow, and yes it is. But see they have a cleaver solution for that too. Because everything is counted locally at the polling place, and it's distributed, which means each polling place typically has no more than 500 or so votes. This way they can also easier check that each voter is eligible to vote as they can only go to their local district. This to prevent the same person from voting multiple times.

6
Brannvesen 6 points ago +6 / -0

It also takes a tremendous amount of stupidity to film yourself committing such serious crime which could result in several years in prison. Nobody is that stupid.

1
Brannvesen 1 point ago +3 / -2

Go ahead and look further back, he claimed to be Finnish several times. That means he's lying.

2
Brannvesen 2 points ago +3 / -1

You will have to dig deeper, and check the internet archive. Because he's very fast at deleting his former posts. Also note that many iterations of this picture is embedded in X posts, those show the profile picture of the user in the preview and doesn't load until you click on them.

I can do some digging and come back later with a full chart.

However, you've already seen 4 iterations during some lazy scrolling, 4 re-posts of the same lie, just like I said. Does that look organic? Would you make 4 re-posts of the same chart unless you were a paid shill? probably not.

-1
Brannvesen -1 points ago +3 / -4

You don't have time to check his profile history: https://scored.co/u/Chukna?type=post

Don't be ignorant, that's how you become a victim of propaganda.

Also notice how everything is duplicated.

2
Brannvesen 2 points ago +5 / -3

That's because OP edited the original after being called out the last 500 times he lied about this, check his history. Every version of this chart is different.

0
Brannvesen 0 points ago +5 / -5

That wouldn't reduce the cost, because this is the total federal military spending.

That said, the US could save maybe a few billions by not fucking around allover the world. But that also means fewer countries will buy US military equipment as they no longer have to, which means less jobs in the US, which means less tax income and more people on welfare.

My guess is that it would be net loss. Especially when losing leverage over other countries, while simultaneously becoming more dependent on EU and China.

7
Brannvesen 7 points ago +8 / -1

Hey look, it's a screenshot suggesting that 15% of the US entire military spending goes to "defending Finland" for absolutely no reason at all and without any evidence. It must be true. 🤡 Honk Honk 🤡

7
Brannvesen 7 points ago +12 / -5

The only way the US could save $860B per year is by dismantling it's entire military industrial complex. No army, no navy, no air force, no guns, no vehicles, just a sitting duck waiting for Russia or China to invade, with a decent chance of taking over as they won't face much resistance.

3
Brannvesen 3 points ago +3 / -0

You threatened to annex your neighbors garage and most of his yard and gets offended when he threatens to shoot you. Play stupid games, win stupid prices. 🤡🌎

3
Brannvesen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whatever it is, no matter if it's mining rights, more military bases, a harbor to control the new shipping routes, Denmark has never been in the way if the US wanted to do any of that.

Denmark has also consistently kept China and Russia away, every time the Greenlanders tries to make deals with them under the table, to protect US interests.

By taking over or buying the whole island, American taxpayers will just takes on the upkeep costs of it. Which is now currently 70% funded by Denmark and 30% by their local economy which is based on fishing.

3
Brannvesen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fake news media is spreading misinformation as usual. No matter what he actually said, the information EU leaders have gotten is direct threats of a military takeover. I saw the speech, he more or less "didn't exclude that option" which the media interpret as threats, which is then translated into actual threats.

Trump needs to clarify what he said before warmongering fake news media causes WW3.

4
Brannvesen 4 points ago +4 / -0

EU supplies mostly humanitarian aid to Ukraine, the Biden regime was the real warmongers. Russia knows this, and won't appreciate if the US gets away with essentially the same thing. China will likely have a problem with such takeover too.

3
Brannvesen 3 points ago +3 / -0

There won't be any military response, because neither side would benefit from such pointless war. and with nukes we'd all lose.

Economic warfare is a more likely outcome. EU and China controls the worlds shipping, with Mærsk being one of the largest shippers. If they all sanction the US, it'll be two weeks or so until the entire country is crippled from broken supply chains.

Remember the plandemic, were all they did was to impose some "green" policy forcing ships to go slower to save fuel and it almost crippled the US, just by a small slowdown in the supply chains.

view more: Next ›