The response:
Donald Trump has outlined a 10-point plan to dismantle what he refers to as the "deep state" if he is inaugurated again. His plan includes reissuing his 2020 executive order to remove bureaucrats, cleaning out corrupt actors in national security and intelligence, and reforming FISA courts2. Whether he will be able to fully implement these measures remains to be seen, as it will depend on various factors including political support and legal challenges.
And it gave 3 links
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-dismantle-deep-state-truth-reconciliation-commission-1789374
https://www.newsx.com/us-elections-2024/trump-releases-plan-to-dismantle-the-american-deep-state/
It surprised me how easy it was as I am somewhat retarded when it comes to tech.
I took it down almost 4 years ago with the "inauguration" of the Biden.
Now, with Trump's win it goes back up.
Now is the time to be careful though.
The rats are cornered and will be lashing out.
Head on a swivel.
NCSWIC
WWG1WGA
Wait..what?
Sounds more like they are trying to create chaos by telling those who ALREADY VOTED to go to the polls on election day to ensure their vote is done correctly?
This morning outside Madison Square Garden.
https://x.com/joma_gc/status/1850501252246913486
WWG1WGA
They must have held a security briefing prior to even setting up. Telling agents what to expect and to look out for. What were the agents told? Were they given information that would lead them to believe something other than what is actually happening? Any information on this security briefing would be appreciated.
The debate appears to be under the control of the Q-team.
Almost like it's scripted. I cant believe it. FJB is showing all the things discussed here.
(popcorn)
I used the Q-Alerts app to follow Q. Just received a notification:
Please ignore this is only a test.
Went to the app and nothing changed.
We shall see.
The Second Amendment
Gun Owners of America (GOA) has made a bold move that could potentially reshape the gun rights landscape in the United States by launching a groundbreaking lawsuit in New York. Central to the lawsuit is the argument that New York's stringent firearm laws unjustly impede the Second Amendment rights of non-residents.
Presently, New York does not grant handgun carry licenses to non-residents and does not acknowledge licenses issued by other states. This leaves individuals visiting New York for work or leisure unable to exercise their right to self-defense.
To grasp the importance of this legal action, one must consider the legal foundations that support it. Years of Second Amendment legal rulings, including landmark cases such as District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, have affirmed an individual's right to possess and carry arms for self-protection.
Additionally, the Supreme Court's ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen established a rigorous standard for assessing the constitutionality of firearm regulations.
Should this lawsuit succeed, its impact could be profound. At the very least, New York might be compelled to grant licenses to non-residents and acknowledge permits issued by other states.
However, the repercussions could extend even further. The case might prompt the Supreme Court to reexamine the issue of national reciprocity for concealed carry permits, a cause long advocated by gun rights proponents.
While the legal arguments presented by GOA are strong, the path ahead is laden with obstacles. New York is renowned for its strict gun control measures, and the state government is likely to vigorously uphold its existing laws.
Furthermore, the lawsuit's outcome may ultimately depend on the Supreme Court's composition and the justices' interpretation of constitutional principles.
Regardless of the lawsuit's result, its mere existence underscores the ongoing struggle over gun rights in the United States. As the debate continues, it raises fundamental questions about the equilibrium between individual freedoms and public safety.
Additionally, it emphasizes the judiciary's role in interpreting the Second Amendment and safeguarding constitutional rights. As this legal battle unfolds, it is crucial for gun owners and advocates to remain informed and involved. The outcome of this challenge could have significant implications for the exercise of Second Amendment rights nationwide.
By staying informed about developments and supporting organizations like GOA, individuals can play a crucial role in shaping the future of gun rights in America.
The community expressed their opinions on this issue in the comments section: “We shouldn’t require permission from the government to be able to protect ourselves. There shouldn’t be a ‘licensing’ requirement in any state.”
A different individual said: “How come we’re all still pretending that requiring a license to exercise a Right is somehow acceptable?” An individual highlighted an intriguing observation: “If you’re flying from Texas to a state that authorizes carrying and your plane has to make an unscheduled landing in New York you can get entangled with their judicial system. Despicable State!”
A commentator reached this conclusion: “We have a national carry law!!!! It’s called the 2nd amendment!!! DA. Shall not be infringed!” The legal action initiated by GOA against New York marks a significant milestone in the ongoing battle for gun rights.
Posted by a friend on fb. He is a landlord with roughly 50 units.
This is only the retail rental industry. Only Connecticut. And only the LL's he associates with. There are other industries in the same boat. We have been waiting 7 years. The wait is almost over. The event is coming.
May 13th 2020 This is what it was like for landlords in CT. I polled 151 CT landlords that represent 4203 apartments. 3252 paid rent. This includes assistance programs like section 8. This includes partial payments. 77.4% For those unfamiliar, this is bad. Never forget.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Translation: In order for an independent free state to securely exist, the state must control a well regulated militia for defense.
Thus for the people to remain free of state tyranny, the people must be able to keep and bear arms in the event of said tyranny.
Found this on a local page on fb. The survey, which is not on fb, will kick you out if you are not between the ages of 18-50. The questions sound more like the Health District wants to know why their vaccine programming is not working anymore.
Bristol-Burlington Health District BBHD is conducting a survey to elicit feedback about Bristol and Burlington communities. This information will be used to guide future decisions on vaccine-related programs. Please take a moment to complete this brief survey. Thank you! BBHD está llevando a cabo una encuesta para obtener comentarios sobre las comunidades de Bristol y Burlington. Esta información se utilizará para orientar decisiones futuras sobre programas relacionados con vacunas. Por favor, tómese un momento para completar esta breve encuesta. ¡Gracias! Anonymous survey link: https://yalesurvey.ca1.qualtrics.com/.../SV_3yBB7Iliq6tUVUi
This survey is geared towards the 18-50 year old population.
Thoughts?