Seriously, check it out if you haven't. It's a Canadian film from 2008, not Hollywood, which is probably why it's so full of truth. I can't say too much about it without spoiling "the big twist," but I promise it's unlike anything else you've seen and it will absolutely resonate with you if you're following current world events.
Here's the very first scene of the film, hopefully enough to pique your interest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQauJW09qRs
Wish I knew of more movies like it!
I was banned today from The Gateway Pundit for bringing up soviet history on involuntary confinement - basically, they used it to imprison any political dissidents under the guise of protecting their mental health. I did not realize this was a hot take.
This is the article I left a comment on: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/ohio-man-executes-4-neighbors-mind-control-posts-insane-facebook-rant-claiming-used-telepathy-control-video/
My comment was deleted without notification or warning, and I'm not able to respond to users who wanted to have further conversation with me about the subject.
Takeaway: be very wary of what you read on The Gateway Pundit, as they probably fabricate their articles. Their publications are regularly shared on this website, which is why I'm making this post.
I just saw this interesting post by u/ImGumbyDammit about the latest twist in the Uvalde psy-op:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEcWe5At/a-tdwin-postlol-please-be-real-p/c/?sort=new
Well, forgive me, but these kinds of images tend to crop up a lot around here and they are usually PhotoShopped - my theory is that the so-called "fact checking" websites plant these images on spicy communities, we sometimes fall for it, and they later publish an article proving the image is fake in order to undermine our credibility.
I figured that's what's happening here, but you know what? If this photo of Alves was manipulated, I'm having trouble finding the original. Here's a reverse Google search of "visually similar images" and there is no evidence of photo manipulation:
In fact, there are even high resolution versions of this image which would be RARE for a photoshop:
https://i.ibb.co/gjGLJwg/image.png
Manipulated photos tend to be shared in low resolution with fuzzy details in order to hide the fact that manipulation took place - this is why political news footage tends to look so much worse than, say, some random guy making a YouTube video. It's on purpose. There's all kinds of trickery afoot in political news media.
Anyway, this thing seems legit, but I wanted to post the results of my research in case they (fact-checking websites) somehow procure evidence later on debunking the image. Such evidence does not seem to exist right now.
I'm not someone who typically has a strong reaction to pollen, but as of the last few weeks, if I keep a nearby window open for more than a few minutes, I'll go on a sneezing frenzy that lasts 1-2 hours.
Is there something new in the air or what?
I would still consider my own symptoms mild, but I wonder what this would do to someone who was jabbed.
You get '22 - the same year that the Ministry of Truth was officially formed.
Just saying.
Beware of those who name-call others for having different opinions, or for simply struggling with faith.
Independent thought is a beautiful thing. Use it.
I've been meaning to post this for a while. After reading some of the comments in u/KimJongUn's thread about the lack of any damning DS footage being leaked to the press, I figure now's a good time.
Some commenters have fallen victim to a line of propaganda that is commonly associated with anti-second amendment rhetoric: the idea that the average joe should be prohibited from witnessing, owning, or engaging in an activity due to its dark qualities, potential for danger, or simply because it's illegal.
To paraphrase a couple examples:
"They can't leak footage of the deepstate performing child sacrifices because viewing it would be illegal."
"We should prevent people from owning guns because they can be used to kill people."
Why are these statements similar? Because they both give evil the upper hand.
Whether or not you ban guns, criminals will continue obtaining guns.
Whether or not you prevent the exposure of the deepstate's crimes, the deepstate will continue committing crimes.
You think you impede evil with these obstacles, but in fact you have only crippled the good guys' ability to fight back.
This form of brainwashing can be traced back to a phrase they pushed on us all the way back in elementary school:
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
It's quite a masterful stroke of propaganda. It's fashioned in a way that just has an undeniable air of wisdom. You know how fortune cookies tend to sound really clever until you stop to consider their meaning, and you realize it's either gibberish or outright wrong?
Yeah, that's what this is.
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
Wrong. Here's how it really works:
Without an eye for an eye, only the wicked shall see.
Stop allowing evil to trample over you. We're not playing by the same set of rules. You follow the rules, they don't. We should take the time to really understand this aspect of life, or we will lose.
I've started seeing the error message again.
Evangelion is a Japanese cartoon about a satanic government organization that manipulates orphan children into doing battle with a faction of mysterious, angelic entities. The angels attempt to stop mankind's transition to a New World Order.
How many angels are sent? They send 17.
The show was released in 1995.
e.g.
https://github.com/commons-app/apps-android-commons/issues/2328
EDIT: Come to think of it, isn't Instagram owned by Facebook? It seems likely to me that this metadata is automatically inserted by the platform at the time of image upload. In other words, it may be a nothingburger. (Although the image itself is still very interesting)